157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32741908)
1. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical, Urinary, and Survival Outcomes of Nerve-sparing Versus Traditional Radical Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in China.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Am J Clin Oncol; 2019 Oct; 42(10):783-788. PubMed ID: 31490195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oncologic effectiveness of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer.
Ditto A; Bogani G; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Martinelli F; Chiappa V; Lopez C; Perotto S; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 May; 29(3):e41. PubMed ID: 29533024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.
Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Spagnolo E; Casadio P; Clarizia R; Peiretti M; Bruni F; Peters I; Aletti G
Anticancer Res; 2012 Feb; 32(2):581-8. PubMed ID: 22287748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical efficacy and safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Long Y; Yao DS; Pan XW; Ou TY
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94116. PubMed ID: 24748015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres.
Yin S; Ma SN; Zhang YQ; Shi TY; Xiang LB; Ren YL; Zang RY
Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 27(3):380-386. PubMed ID: 30217291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).
Kietpeerakool C; Aue-Aungkul A; Galaal K; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 2(2):CD012828. PubMed ID: 30746689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the nerve trauma in cardinal ligament.
Chen C; Li W; Li F; Liu P; Zhou J; Lu L; Su G; Li X; Guo Y; Huang L
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 22209773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Pilot Study.
Hao M; Wang Z; Wei F; Wang J; Wang W; Ping Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):594-9. PubMed ID: 26807637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of survival and quality of life.
van Gent MD; Romijn LM; van Santen KE; Trimbos JB; de Kroon CD
Maturitas; 2016 Dec; 94():30-38. PubMed ID: 27823742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
Tseng CJ; Shen HP; Lin YH; Lee CY; Wei-Cheng Chiu W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 22482969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Urodynamics and Survival Outcomes of Different Methods of Dissecting the Inferior Hypogastric Plexus in Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy of Type C: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Li L; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Wu M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 May; 26(5):1560-1568. PubMed ID: 30759291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function recovery and quality of life in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Wu J; Liu X; Hua K; Hu C; Chen X; Lu X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jul; 20(5):905-9. PubMed ID: 20606542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application research on nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for rectal function.
Su Y; Zhang M; Zhang W; Shi H
Pak J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jan; 30(1 Suppl):329-334. PubMed ID: 28625962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
