These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32744759)

  • 21. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science.
    Hopkins WG; Marshall SW; Batterham AM; Hanin J
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2009 Jan; 41(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 19092709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conducting sensitivity analyses to identify and buffer power vulnerabilities in studies examining substance use over time.
    Lane SP; Hennes EP
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jul; 94():117-123. PubMed ID: 30309635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive designs: looking for a needle in the haystack-a new challenge in medical research.
    Bauer P
    Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(10):1565-80. PubMed ID: 17935261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating statistical power for event-related potential studies using the late positive potential.
    Gibney KD; Kypriotakis G; Cinciripini PM; Robinson JD; Minnix JA; Versace F
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13482. PubMed ID: 31608456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Physiological and behavioral parameters of infants' categorization: changes in heart rate and duration of examining across trials.
    Elsner B; Pauen S; Jeschonek S
    Dev Sci; 2006 Nov; 9(6):551-6. PubMed ID: 17059451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Study design: the basics.
    Lim HJ; Hoffmann RG
    Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 404():1-17. PubMed ID: 18450042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How often should we expect to be wrong? Statistical power, P values, and the expected prevalence of false discoveries.
    Marino MJ
    Biochem Pharmacol; 2018 May; 151():226-233. PubMed ID: 29248599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of sample size and analytic approach on stability and interpretation of brain-behavior correlations in task-related fMRI data.
    Grady CL; Rieck JR; Nichol D; Rodrigue KM; Kennedy KM
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Jan; 42(1):204-219. PubMed ID: 32996635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Oh, Behave!: PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS, XXth International Conference on Infant Studies New Orleans, LA, US May 2016.
    Adolph KE
    Infancy; 2020; 25(4):374-392. PubMed ID: 33100922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Research Techniques Made Simple: Sample Size Estimation and Power Calculation.
    Schmidt SAJ; Lo S; Hollestein LM
    J Invest Dermatol; 2018 Aug; 138(8):1678-1682. PubMed ID: 30032783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Covariate adjustments in randomized controlled trials increased study power and reduced biasedness of effect size estimation.
    Lee PH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():137-46. PubMed ID: 26921693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Conducting power analyses for ANOVA and ANCOVA in between-subjects designs.
    Algina J; Olejnik S
    Eval Health Prof; 2003 Sep; 26(3):288-314. PubMed ID: 12971201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical trials with nested subgroups: Analysis, sample size determination and internal pilot studies.
    Placzek M; Friede T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Nov; 27(11):3286-3303. PubMed ID: 29298604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sample size and power for a stratified doubly randomized preference design.
    Cameron B; Esserman DA
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Jul; 27(7):2168-2184. PubMed ID: 27872194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Care of preterm infants: programs of research and their relationship to developmental science.
    Holditch-Davis D; Black BP
    Annu Rev Nurs Res; 2003; 21():23-60. PubMed ID: 12858692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sufficient Sample Size and Power in Multilevel Ordinal Logistic Regression Models.
    Ali S; Ali A; Khan SA; Hussain S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():7329158. PubMed ID: 27746826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Infants prefer motionese to adult-directed action.
    Brand RJ; Shallcross WL
    Dev Sci; 2008 Nov; 11(6):853-61. PubMed ID: 19046154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dropout in looking time studies: The role of infants' temperament and cognitive developmental status.
    Klein-Radukic S; Zmyj N
    Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Nov; 41():142-53. PubMed ID: 26479828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Simulation methods to estimate design power: an overview for applied research.
    Arnold BF; Hogan DR; Colford JM; Hubbard AE
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Jun; 11():94. PubMed ID: 21689447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Infants' understanding of intention from 10 to 14 months: Interrelations among violation of expectancy and imitation tasks.
    Olineck KM; Poulin-Dubois D
    Infant Behav Dev; 2009 Dec; 32(4):404-15. PubMed ID: 19619899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.