These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32744855)

  • 1. Age-related deficits in the congruency sequence effect are task-specific: An investigation of nine tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Psychol Aging; 2020 Aug; 35(5):744-764. PubMed ID: 32744855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic adjustments of attentional control in healthy aging.
    Aschenbrenner AJ; Balota DA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Feb; 32(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 28182494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of task-relevant and task-irrelevant information in congruency sequence effects: Applying the diffusion model for conflict tasks.
    Koob V; Mackenzie I; Ulrich R; Leuthold H; Janczyk M
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101528. PubMed ID: 36584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Registered Replication Report of Weissman, D. H., Jiang, J., & Egner, T. (2014). Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.
    Gyurkovics M; Kovacs M; Jaquiery M; Palfi B; Dechterenko F; Aczel B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Nov; 82(8):3777-3787. PubMed ID: 32935289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A diffusion model for the congruency sequence effect.
    Luo C; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2034-2051. PubMed ID: 35676612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Target-distractor congruency: sequential effects in a temporal flanker task.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Sprengel M; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2020 Mar; 84(2):292-301. PubMed ID: 30083838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjustments of selective attention to response conflict - controlling for perceptual conflict, target-distractor identity, and congruency level sequence pertaining to the congruency sequence effect.
    Tomat M; Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Aug; 83(6):2531-2550. PubMed ID: 33948882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Boehler CN; Notebaert W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110462. PubMed ID: 25340396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The congruency sequence effect transfers across different response modes.
    Weissman DH; Colter K; Drake B; Morgan C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Oct; 161():86-94. PubMed ID: 26343331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence for the reduction of task competition and attentional adjustment during task-switching practice.
    Strobach T; Wendt M; Tomat M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Mar; 204():103036. PubMed ID: 32086004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distributional analyses reveal the individual differences in congruency sequence effect.
    Tang D; Chen X; Li H; Lei Y
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272621. PubMed ID: 35994475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition in aging: What is preserved? What declines? A meta-analysis.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1695-1716. PubMed ID: 29019064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The congruency sequence effect emerges when the distracter precedes the target.
    Weissman DH; Egner T; Hawks Z; Link J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Mar; 156():8-21. PubMed ID: 25616120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conflict-monitoring theory in overtime: Is temporal learning a viable explanation for the congruency sequence effect?
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 May; 48(5):497-530. PubMed ID: 35389710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():31-41. PubMed ID: 30408614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Both congruent and incongruent trials drive the congruency sequence effect: Novel support for an episodic retrieval view of adaptive control in the prime-probe task.
    Dunaway MG; Weissman DH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 38647457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Additive Effects of Item-Specific and Congruency Sequence Effects in the Vocal Stroop Task.
    Aschenbrenner AJ; Balota DA
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():860. PubMed ID: 31105619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.