187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32745622)
21. Women's preferences for permanent contraception method and willingness to be randomized for a hypothetical trial.
Piazza A; Schwirian K; Scott F; Wilson MD; Zite NB; Creinin MD
Contraception; 2019 Jan; 99(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 30266212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Adoption of Complete Bilateral Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception at Time of Cesarean Delivery in Rhode Island.
DiSilvestro JB; Raker CA; Velasquez J; Mathews CA
R I Med J (2013); 2023 Jun; 106(5):49-53. PubMed ID: 37195163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.
Gormley R; Vickers B; Cheng B; Norman WV
Reprod Health; 2021 Jul; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 34284794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Applicability, Safety, and Efficiency of Salpingectomy versus Electrocoagulation and Laparoscopic Tubal Section in Ambulatory.
Pereira JMA; Trocado VFB; Gomes SMS; Carlos-Alves M; Carvalho A; Pinheiro PA
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 44(9):866-870. PubMed ID: 36037814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Trend, Feasibility, and Safety of Salpingectomy as a form of Permanent Sterilization.
Kim AJ; Barberio A; Berens P; Chen HY; Gants S; Swilinski L; Acholonu U; Chang-Jackson SC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(7):1363-1368. PubMed ID: 30771489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Risks and Benefits of Salpingectomy at the Time of Sterilization.
Castellano T; Zerden M; Marsh L; Boggess K
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2017 Nov; 72(11):663-668. PubMed ID: 29164264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Total bilateral salpingectomy versus partial bilateral salpingectomy for permanent sterilization during cesarean delivery.
Shinar S; Blecher Y; Alpern S; Many A; Ashwal E; Amikam U; Cohen A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1185-1189. PubMed ID: 28285425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Sterilization at the time of cesarean section: tubal ligation or hysterectomy?
Bukovsky I; Schneider D; Weinraub Z; Arieli S; Schreyer P; Caspi E
Contraception; 1983 Oct; 28(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 6667624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Female tubal sterilization: the time has come to routinely consider removal.
Creinin MD; Zite N
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Sep; 124(3):596-599. PubMed ID: 25162262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The cost-effectiveness of opportunistic salpingectomy versus standard tubal ligation at the time of cesarean delivery for ovarian cancer risk reduction.
Subramaniam A; Einerson BD; Blanchard CT; Erickson BK; Szychowski J; Leath CA; Biggio JR; Huh WK
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Jan; 152(1):127-132. PubMed ID: 30477808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Roeckner JT; Sawangkum P; Sanchez-Ramos L; Duncan JR
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 135(3):550-557. PubMed ID: 32080033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Safety and Assisted Reproductive Technology Outcomes of Hysteroscopic Tubal Microinserts Versus Laparoscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion or Salpingectomy for Hydrosalpinges Treatment.
Arora R; Shapiro H; Liu K; Arthur R; Cruickshank B; Sharma P; Glass K; Baratz A; Librach C; Greenblatt EM
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Jun; 42(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 32224160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Feasibility, Safety, and Provider Perspectives of Bipolar Electrosurgical Cautery Device for (Opportunistic or Complete) Salpingectomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery.
Ostby SA; Blanchard CT; Sanjanwala AR; Szychowski JM; Leath CA; Huh WK; Subramaniam A
Am J Perinatol; 2024 Apr; 41(6):804-813. PubMed ID: 35728603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bilateral salpingectomy as an option of permanent contraception at time of caesarean section: A survey of practice.
Noori N; Edwards L; Anpalagan A; Athavale R; Burling M; Herbst U; Brand A; Kapurubandara S
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2024 Feb; 64(1):72-76. PubMed ID: 37674327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Opportunistic Salpingectomy for Permanent Contraception: A Cross Sectional Study in Portugal].
São Pedro V; Pires R; Santos F; Tovim Rodrigues C; Santos Silva I; Almeida MC; Águas F
Acta Med Port; 2021 Mar; 34(4):258-265. PubMed ID: 34214417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT.
Dreyer K; Lier MC; Emanuel MH; Twisk JW; Mol BW; Schats R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2005-16. PubMed ID: 27209341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Regret in the Modern Contraceptive Landscape: Evaluating Regret in Patients Undergoing Tubal Ligation or Bilateral Salpingectomy for Contraception.
Rodowa MS; Waddington A; Pudwell J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2024 May; 46(5):102362. PubMed ID: 38272216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 2016(8):CD003034. PubMed ID: 27494193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation.
Lawrie TA; Kulier R; Nardin JM
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Sep; (9):CD003034. PubMed ID: 26343930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
