188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32745622)
61. Examining indicators of early menopause following opportunistic salpingectomy: a cohort study from British Columbia, Canada.
Hanley GE; Kwon JS; McAlpine JN; Huntsman DG; Finlayson SJ; Miller D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):221.e1-221.e11. PubMed ID: 32067967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Barriers to salpingectomy for permanent contraception: A qualitative study with obstetricians and gynaecologists.
Obermair HM; Muir G; Gard GB
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Dec; 61(6):973-977. PubMed ID: 34554566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Tubal ligation by colpotomy incision.
Whitaker CF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Aug; 134(8):885-8. PubMed ID: 463993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Salpingectomy and proximal tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhang Y; Sun Y; Guo Y; Li TC; Duan H
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2015 Jan; 70(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25616345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Changes in the rate of tubal ligation done after cesarean section.
Moreno JM; Bartual E; Carmona M; Araico F; Miranda JA; Herruzo AJ
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2001 Aug; 97(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 11451539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Puerperal tubal sterilization: report of 1,830 cases.
Prystowsky H; Eastman NJ
J Am Med Assoc; 1955 Jun; 158(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 12275461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Access to postpartum tubal ligation services in Cape Town, South Africa - an observational study.
Vorster M; Petro G; Patel M
S Afr Med J; 2022 Dec; 113(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 36537545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Ectopic pregnancy in women with previous tubal sterilizations at a Canadian community hospital.
Greisman B
J Reprod Med; 1991 Mar; 36(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 2030496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial).
Mol F; van Mello NM; Strandell A; Jurkovic D; Ross JA; Yalcinkaya TM; Barnhart KT; Verhoeve HR; Graziosi GC; Koks CA; Mol BW; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ; van Wely M;
Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2038-47. PubMed ID: 26173606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Surgical treatment for hydrosalpinx prior to in-vitro fertilization embryo transfer: a network meta-analysis.
Tsiami A; Chaimani A; Mavridis D; Siskou M; Assimakopoulos E; Sotiriadis A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 48(4):434-445. PubMed ID: 26922863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Longitudinal assessment of anti-Müllerian hormone after cesarean section and influence of bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve.
Ida T; Fujiwara H; Taniguchi Y; Kohyama A
Contraception; 2021 Jun; 103(6):394-399. PubMed ID: 33539802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Failures following tubal sterilization.
Ayhan A; Kisnisci H; Saracoglu OF; Aydin C; Aslan A
Acta Reprod Turc; 1983 Jul; 5(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 12267665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. [Vaginal tubal sterilization: About a series of 158 patients from 2005 to 2021].
Picard M; Duforestel T
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Jun; 50(6):470-474. PubMed ID: 35121173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Risk-Reducing Salpingectomy Versus Standard Tubal Sterilization: Lessons From Offering Women Options for Interval Sterilization.
Zerden ML; Castellano T; Doll KM; Stuart GS; Munoz MC; Boggess KA
South Med J; 2018 Mar; 111(3):173-177. PubMed ID: 29505655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Tubal sterilization during cesarean section or as an elective procedure? Effect on the ovarian reserve.
Ozyer S; Moraloğlu O; Gülerman C; Engin-Üstün Y; Uzunlar O; Karayalçin R; Uğur M
Contraception; 2012 Nov; 86(5):488-93. PubMed ID: 22520643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. [Controversy on the method of sterilization during cesarean section: tubal ligation or hysterectomy? Review of the literature].
Kouam L; Kamdom-Moyo J; Doh A; Ngassa P; Shasha W
Contracept Fertil Sex; 1994 Mar; 22(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 8019606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Postpartum Opportunistic Salpingectomy Compared With Bilateral Tubal Ligation After Vaginal Delivery for Ovarian Cancer Risk Reduction: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Wagar MK; Forlines GL; Moellman N; Carlson A; Matthews M; Williams M
Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Apr; 141(4):819-827. PubMed ID: 36897130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. [Controversy on the method of sterilization during cesarean section: tubal ligation or hysterectomy? Review of the literature].
Kouam L; Kamdom-moyo J; Doh A; Ngassa P; Shasha W
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1994 Mar; 22(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 12319658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic salpingectomy in tubal pregnancy: a comparison of surgical outcomes.
Yoon BS; Park H; Seong SJ; Park CT; Jun HS; Kim IH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Nov; 159(1):190-3. PubMed ID: 21741748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [Effects of tubal sterilization].
Korell M; Englmaier R; Hepp H
Zentralbl Gynakol; 2000; 122(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 10785948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
