These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32746058)

  • 1. Unified Expression of the Quasi-Static Electromagnetic Field: Demonstration With MEG and EEG Signals.
    Taulu S; Larson E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2021 Mar; 68(3):992-1004. PubMed ID: 32746058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combined MEG and EEG source imaging by minimization of mutual information.
    Baillet S; Garnero L; Marin G; Hugonin JP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 May; 46(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 10230131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods.
    Mosher JC; Leahy RM; Lewis PS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1999 Mar; 46(3):245-59. PubMed ID: 10097460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial sampling of MEG and EEG based on generalized spatial-frequency analysis and optimal design.
    Iivanainen J; Mäkinen AJ; Zetter R; Stenroos M; Ilmoniemi RJ; Parkkonen L
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118747. PubMed ID: 34852277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetoencephalography for localizing and characterizing the epileptic focus.
    Burgess RC
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():203-214. PubMed ID: 31277848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
    Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of EEG and MEG in source localization of induced human gamma-band oscillations during visual stimulus.
    Mideksa KG; Hoogenboom N; Hellriegel H; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():8119-22. PubMed ID: 26738178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dipole models for the EEG and MEG.
    Schimpf PH; Ramon C; Haueisen J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 May; 49(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 12002172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dipole source analysis for readiness potential and field using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
    Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1362-5. PubMed ID: 24109949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-resolution source imaging in mesiotemporal lobe epilepsy: a comparison between MEG and simultaneous EEG.
    Leijten FS; Huiskamp GJ; Hilgersom I; Van Huffelen AC
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2003; 20(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 14530735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data.
    Neymotin SA; Daniels DS; Caldwell B; McDougal RA; Carnevale NT; Jas M; Moore CI; Hines ML; Hämäläinen M; Jones SR
    Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31967544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Source localization of EEG versus MEG: empirical comparison using visually evoked responses and theoretical considerations.
    Lopes da Silva FH; Wieringa HJ; Peters MJ
    Brain Topogr; 1991; 4(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 1793687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suppression of interference and artifacts by the Signal Space Separation Method.
    Taulu S; Kajola M; Simola J
    Brain Topogr; 2004; 16(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 15379226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bioelectromagnetic forward problem: isolated source approach revis(it)ed.
    Stenroos M; Sarvas J
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Jun; 57(11):3517-35. PubMed ID: 22581305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of signal space separation via simulation.
    Song T; Gaa K; Cui L; Feffer L; Lee RR; Huang M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2008 Sep; 46(9):923-32. PubMed ID: 18196307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Magnetoencephalography, a new function diagnostic method].
    Vieth J
    EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1984 Jun; 15(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 6088213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.
    Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Wollbrink A; Oostenveld R; Rampp S; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Dec; 40(17):5011-5028. PubMed ID: 31397966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.