These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32746526)

  • 21. Comparison of Fusion Rate and Clinical Outcomes in Minimally Invasive and Conventional Posterior Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis.
    Ren BW; Zhao HM; Wu JH; An BC; Han ZC; Liu YH; Mao KY; Liu JH
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38871284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of three patients.
    Aoki Y; Yamagata M; Nakajima F; Ikeda Y; Takahashi K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 19127150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion without general anesthesia: operative and clinical outcomes in 100 consecutive patients with a minimum 1-year follow-up.
    Kolcun JPG; Brusko GD; Basil GW; Epstein R; Wang MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 Apr; 46(4):E14. PubMed ID: 30933915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery: Let's tell someone.
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 3):S96-S101. PubMed ID: 26904373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Endoscopic Extreme Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Large Spacers: A Technical Note and Preliminary Report.
    Eum JH; Park JH; Song KS; Lee SM; Suh DW; Jo DJ
    Orthopedics; 2022; 45(3):163-168. PubMed ID: 35112965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages].
    Fleege C; Rickert M; Rauschmann M
    Orthopade; 2015 Feb; 44(2):114-23. PubMed ID: 25588711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. More nerve root injuries occur with minimally invasive lumbar surgery, especially extreme lateral interbody fusion: A review.
    Epstein NE
    Surg Neurol Int; 2016; 7(Suppl 3):S83-95. PubMed ID: 26904372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Step-by-step guide to robotic-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF).
    Sarmiento JM; Shahi P; Melissaridou D; Fourman MS; Araghi K; Qureshi SA
    Ann Transl Med; 2023 Mar; 11(5):221. PubMed ID: 37007570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Full Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technical Note.
    Nakamura S; Taguchi M
    J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg; 2017 Nov; 78(6):601-606. PubMed ID: 28800666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Selective Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Decompression for Multilevel Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Lee WM; You KH; Kang MS; Kim JH; Park HJ
    Asian Spine J; 2023 Apr; 17(2):392-400. PubMed ID: 36717091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. In vitro comparison of endplate preparation between four mini-open interbody fusion approaches.
    Tatsumi R; Lee YP; Khajavi K; Taylor W; Chen F; Bae H
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24 Suppl 3():372-7. PubMed ID: 25874742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Preliminary clinical outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases in a tertiary hospital: Is percutaneous endoscopic procedure superior to MIS-TLIF? A prospective cohort study.
    Ao S; Zheng W; Wu J; Tang Y; Zhang C; Zhou Y; Li C
    Int J Surg; 2020 Apr; 76():136-143. PubMed ID: 32165279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical and radiological outcomes of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) compared with conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF): 1-year follow-up.
    Park MK; Park SA; Son SK; Park WW; Choi SH
    Neurosurg Rev; 2019 Sep; 42(3):753-761. PubMed ID: 31144195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M; Cyriac M; Haines CM; Gudipally M; O'Brien JR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Analysis of technical advantages and disadvantages of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and its trend prospect].
    Zhang B; Kong Q; Rong L
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):653-659. PubMed ID: 35712920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Application of a narrow-surface cage in full endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    He EX; Guo J; Ling QJ; Yin ZX; Wang Y; Li M
    Int J Surg; 2017 Jun; 42():83-89. PubMed ID: 28456707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages.
    Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Kast E; Gottwald M; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(22):E665-70. PubMed ID: 16284577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Chan AK; Bisson EF; Bydon M; Glassman SD; Foley KT; Potts EA; Shaffrey CI; Shaffrey ME; Coric D; Knightly JJ; Park P; Wang MY; Fu KM; Slotkin JR; Asher AL; Virk MS; Kerezoudis P; Alvi MA; Guan J; Haid RW; Mummaneni PV
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E13. PubMed ID: 31042655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.