These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3274666)

  • 1. [Glass ionomer cement and composite resin mixed restorations].
    Martins LR; de Lima Navarro MF; Francischone CE; Lovadino JR; de Almeida JV
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1988; 2(4):229-32. PubMed ID: 3274666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Class II Tunnel restorations of glass-ionomer-silver-Cermet cement and composite].
    Croll TP
    Quintessenz; 1989 Sep; 40(9):1577-88. PubMed ID: 2517954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations.
    Brackett WW; Robinson PB
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Jun; 21(6):445-7. PubMed ID: 2243948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.
    Banomyong D; Messer H
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2013 Nov; 4(4):265-70. PubMed ID: 23355492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vitremer cement for Class I restoration of permanent teeth.
    Croll TP; Cavanaugh RR
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 6(8):25-32; quiz 33. PubMed ID: 7662948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Light-hardened Class I glass-ionomer-resin cement restoration of a permanent molar.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Feb; 24(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 8511261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The border seal in restorations of class-V lesions with glass ionomer cement and composite (the sandwich filling)].
    Hänggi D; Hefti AF; Rateitschak KH
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 2300793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative in vivo evaluation of four restorative concepts for mixed Class V restorations.
    Krejci I; Lutz F; Loher CE
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jun; 22(6):455-65. PubMed ID: 1882038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restorations with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Oct; 20(10):711-6. PubMed ID: 2639386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the resistance of teeth to fracture: bonded composite resin versus glass ionomer cement.
    Eakle WS
    Dent Mater; 1985 Dec; 1(6):229-30. PubMed ID: 3913610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Reinforced glass ionomer restorations in modified Class II cavities].
    Valenzuela V; Stanke F
    Odontol Chil; 1989 Apr; 37(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 2518367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marginal leakage around V-shaped cavities restored with glass-ionomer cements: an in vitro study.
    Zyskind D; Frenkel A; Fuks A; Hirschfeld Z
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Jan; 22(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 1838417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.