BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32746918)

  • 21. SV-Bay: structural variant detection in cancer genomes using a Bayesian approach with correction for GC-content and read mappability.
    Iakovishina D; Janoueix-Lerosey I; Barillot E; Regnier M; Boeva V
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 32(7):984-92. PubMed ID: 26740523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Long-read sequencing settings for efficient structural variation detection based on comprehensive evaluation.
    Jiang T; Liu S; Cao S; Liu Y; Cui Z; Wang Y; Guo H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Nov; 22(1):552. PubMed ID: 34772337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. SVXplorer: Three-tier approach to identification of structural variants via sequential recombination of discordant cluster signatures.
    Kathuria K; Ratan A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007737. PubMed ID: 32182236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. LinkedSV for detection of mosaic structural variants from linked-read exome and genome sequencing data.
    Fang L; Kao C; Gonzalez MV; Mafra FA; Pellegrino da Silva R; Li M; Wenzel SS; Wimmer K; Hakonarson H; Wang K
    Nat Commun; 2019 Dec; 10(1):5585. PubMed ID: 31811119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing structural variation in a personal genome-towards a human reference diploid genome.
    English AC; Salerno WJ; Hampton OA; Gonzaga-Jauregui C; Ambreth S; Ritter DI; Beck CR; Davis CF; Dahdouli M; Ma S; Carroll A; Veeraraghavan N; Bruestle J; Drees B; Hastie A; Lam ET; White S; Mishra P; Wang M; Han Y; Zhang F; Stankiewicz P; Wheeler DA; Reid JG; Muzny DM; Rogers J; Sabo A; Worley KC; Lupski JR; Boerwinkle E; Gibbs RA
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):286. PubMed ID: 25886820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Duphold: scalable, depth-based annotation and curation of high-confidence structural variant calls.
    Pedersen BS; Quinlan AR
    Gigascience; 2019 Apr; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 31222198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Detection and visualization of complex structural variants from long reads.
    Stephens Z; Wang C; Iyer RK; Kocher JP
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Dec; 19(Suppl 20):508. PubMed ID: 30577744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Precise characterization of somatic complex structural variations from tumor/control paired long-read sequencing data with nanomonsv.
    Shiraishi Y; Koya J; Chiba K; Okada A; Arai Y; Saito Y; Shibata T; Kataoka K
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Aug; 51(14):e74. PubMed ID: 37336583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cue: a deep-learning framework for structural variant discovery and genotyping.
    Popic V; Rohlicek C; Cunial F; Hajirasouliha I; Meleshko D; Garimella K; Maheshwari A
    Nat Methods; 2023 Apr; 20(4):559-568. PubMed ID: 36959322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discovery of tandem and interspersed segmental duplications using high-throughput sequencing.
    Soylev A; Le TM; Amini H; Alkan C; Hormozdiari F
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Oct; 35(20):3923-3930. PubMed ID: 30937433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of computational genotyping of structural variation for clinical diagnoses.
    Chander V; Gibbs RA; Sedlazeck FJ
    Gigascience; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31494671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. NPSV-deep: a deep learning method for genotyping structural variants in short read genome sequencing data.
    Linderman MD; Wallace J; van der Heyde A; Wieman E; Brey D; Shi Y; Hansen P; Shamsi Z; Liu J; Gelb BD; Bashir A
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 38444093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. GASOLINE: detecting germline and somatic structural variants from long-reads data.
    Magi A; Mattei G; Mingrino A; Caprioli C; Ronchini C; Frigè G; Semeraro R; Baragli M; Bolognini D; Colombo E; Mazzarella L; Pelicci PG
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20817. PubMed ID: 38012350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Toolkit for automated and rapid discovery of structural variants.
    Soylev A; Kockan C; Hormozdiari F; Alkan C
    Methods; 2017 Oct; 129():3-7. PubMed ID: 28583483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. RAPTR-SV: a hybrid method for the detection of structural variants.
    Bickhart DM; Hutchison JL; Xu L; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF; Reecy JM; Schroeder S; Van Tassell CP; Sonstegard TS; Liu GE
    Bioinformatics; 2015 Jul; 31(13):2084-90. PubMed ID: 25686638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of multiple algorithms to reliably detect structural variants in pears.
    Liu Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Chang W; Sun M; Zhang S; Wu J
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 31959124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. rMETL: sensitive mobile element insertion detection with long read realignment.
    Jiang T; Liu B; Li J; Wang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3484-3486. PubMed ID: 30759188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SVcnn: an accurate deep learning-based method for detecting structural variation based on long-read data.
    Zheng Y; Shang X
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 May; 24(1):213. PubMed ID: 37221476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. NPSV: A simulation-driven approach to genotyping structural variants in whole-genome sequencing data.
    Linderman MD; Paudyal C; Shakeel M; Kelley W; Bashir A; Gelb BD
    Gigascience; 2021 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 34195837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. nanotatoR: a tool for enhanced annotation of genomic structural variants.
    Bhattacharya S; Barseghyan H; Délot EC; Vilain E
    BMC Genomics; 2021 Jan; 22(1):10. PubMed ID: 33407088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.