These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32747197)

  • 1. Rescue Valve-in-Valve-in-Valve TAVR for Acute Transvalvular Aortic Regurgitation.
    Malik IS; Jabbour RJ; Ruparelia N; Sen S; Hadjizoulou N; Rana B; Chukwuemeka AO; Gopalan D; Kotecha T; Mikhail GW
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Nov; 21(11S):11-13. PubMed ID: 32747197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Isolated Redo Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Valve Replacement.
    Patel PM; Chiou E; Cao Y; Binongo J; Guyton RA; Leshnower B; Grubb KJ; Chen EP
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2021 Aug; 112(2):539-545. PubMed ID: 33129775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk for Surgery: A Study of Echocardiographic Change and Risk Prediction.
    Little SH; Oh JK; Gillam L; Sengupta PP; Orsinelli DA; Cavalcante JL; Chang JD; Adams DH; Zorn GL; Pollak AW; Abdelmoneim SS; Reardon MJ; Qiao H; Popma JJ
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 27313280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis comparing valve-in-valve TAVR and redo-SAVR in patients with degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve.
    Saleem S; Ullah W; Syed MA; Megaly M; Thalambedu N; Younas S; Zahid S; Alam M; Virani SS; Verma DR; Abdul-Waheed M; Fischman DL
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Nov; 98(5):940-947. PubMed ID: 34110684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ahmed A; Levy KH
    J Card Surg; 2021 Jul; 36(7):2486-2495. PubMed ID: 33797799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and readmissions for valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement vs. reoperative surgical aortic valve replacement: a contemporary assessment of real-world outcomes.
    Hirji SA; Percy ED; Zogg CK; Malarczyk A; Harloff MT; Yazdchi F; Kaneko T
    Eur Heart J; 2020 Aug; 41(29):2747-2755. PubMed ID: 32445575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Durability of Transcatheter and Surgical Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves in Patients at Lower Surgical Risk.
    Søndergaard L; Ihlemann N; Capodanno D; Jørgensen TH; Nissen H; Kjeldsen BJ; Chang Y; Steinbrüchel DA; Olsen PS; Petronio AS; Thyregod HGH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 73(5):546-553. PubMed ID: 30732707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Longitudinal Hemodynamics of Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valves in the PARTNER Trial.
    Douglas PS; Leon MB; Mack MJ; Svensson LG; Webb JG; Hahn RT; Pibarot P; Weissman NJ; Miller DC; Kapadia S; Herrmann HC; Kodali SK; Makkar RR; Thourani VH; Lerakis S; Lowry AM; Rajeswaran J; Finn MT; Alu MC; Smith CR; Blackstone EH;
    JAMA Cardiol; 2017 Nov; 2(11):1197-1206. PubMed ID: 28973520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement in failed stentless versus stented surgical bioprosthetic aortic valves.
    Choi CH; Cheng V; Malaver D; Kon N; Kincaid EH; Gandhi SK; Applegate RJ; Zhao DXM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1106-1115. PubMed ID: 30588736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Commissural Alignment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve and Native Aortic Valve Following Surgical and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and its Impact on Valvular Function and Coronary Filling.
    Fuchs A; Kofoed KF; Yoon SH; Schaffner Y; Bieliauskas G; Thyregod HG; Makkar R; Søndergaard L; De Backer O; Bapat V
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(17):1733-1743. PubMed ID: 30121280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus redo aortic valve replacement: which procedure for which patient?
    Hutt E; Mehra N; Desai MY
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Dec; 20(12):911-918. PubMed ID: 36433699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Increasing Wait-Time Mortality for Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Population-Level Study of the Transition in Practice From Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
    Albassam O; Henning KA; Qiu F; Cram P; Sheth TN; Ko DT; Woodward G; Austin PC; Wijeysundera HC
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(11):e009297. PubMed ID: 33167700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Procedure in Patients with Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Deterioration.
    Reul RM; Ramchandani MK; Reardon MJ
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2017; 13(3):132-141. PubMed ID: 29743998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preoperative multidetector computed tomography for isolated surgical aortic valve replacement: Planning for future transcatheter options.
    Basman C; Seetharam K; Johnson J; Hemli JM; Brinster DR; Patel NC; Jacob Scheinerman S; Kliger CA; Pirelli L
    J Card Surg; 2020 Dec; 35(12):3354-3361. PubMed ID: 32996186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early Outcomes for Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Degenerative Freestyle Bioprostheses.
    Sang SLW; Beute T; Heiser J; Berkompas D; Fanning J; Merhi W
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2018 Autumn; 30(3):262-268. PubMed ID: 29158054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for the Treatment of Postprocedural and Late Occurrence of Paravalvular Regurgitation and Transcatheter Valve Failure.
    Barbanti M; Webb JG; Tamburino C; Van Mieghem NM; Makkar RR; Piazza N; Latib A; Sinning JM; Won-Keun K; Bleiziffer S; Bedogni F; Kapadia S; Tchetche D; Rodés-Cabau J; Fiorina C; Nombela-Franco L; De Marco F; de Jaegere PP; Chakravarty T; Vaquerizo B; Colombo A; Svensson L; Lange R; Nickenig G; Möllmann H; Walther T; Della Rosa F; Elhmidi Y; Dvir D; Brambilla N; Immè S; Sgroi C; Gulino S; Todaro D; Pilato G; Petronio AS; Tamburino C
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 27578840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcatheter aortic valve in valve implantation with bioprosthetic valve fracture.
    James TM; Stamou SC; Rothenberg M; Nores MA
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1170-1172. PubMed ID: 30790421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
    Sá MPBO; Van den Eynde J; Simonato M; Cavalcanti LRP; Doulamis IP; Weixler V; Kampaktsis PN; Gallo M; Laforgia PL; Zhigalov K; Ruhparwar A; Weymann A; Pibarot P; Clavel MA
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Jan; 14(2):211-220. PubMed ID: 33478639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transcatheter valve-in-valve versus redo surgical aortic valve replacement for the treatment of degenerated bioprosthetic aortic valve: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tam DY; Vo TX; Wijeysundera HC; Dvir D; Friedrich JO; Fremes SE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 92(7):1404-1411. PubMed ID: 30024102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerative Stentless Versus Stented Bioprostheses.
    Duncan A; Moat N; Simonato M; de Weger A; Kempfert J; Eggebrecht H; Walton A; Hellig F; Kornowski R; Spargias K; Mendiz O; Makkar R; Guerrero M; Rihal C; George I; Don C; Iadanza A; Bapat V; Welsh R; Wijeysundera HC; Wood D; Sathananthan J; Danenberg H; Maisano F; Garcia S; Gafoor S; Nombela-Franco L; Cobiella J; Dvir D
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jul; 12(13):1256-1263. PubMed ID: 31202944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.