142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32747409)
1. Financial viewpoint of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: another disadvantage?
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Klar M; Roman L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1464. PubMed ID: 32747409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The LACC Trial: Has Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Been Dealt a Knockout Punch?
Leitao MM
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Sep; 28(7):1248-1250. PubMed ID: 30095706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Martin-Calvo N; Arévalo-Serrano J; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Aliyev S; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Chacon E; Alcazar JL;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 32788262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term oncological outcomes of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective, single-institutional study in the wake of the LACC trial.
Kanno K; Andou M; Yanai S; Toeda M; Nimura R; Ichikawa F; Teishikata Y; Shirane T; Sakate S; Kihira T; Hamasaki Y; Sawada M; Shirane A; Ota Y
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2425-2434. PubMed ID: 31502349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: When Adoption of a Novel Treatment Precedes Prospective, Randomized Evidence.
Melamed A; Rauh-Hain JA; Ramirez PT
J Clin Oncol; 2019 Nov; 37(33):3069-3074. PubMed ID: 31560581
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Selection criteria and colpotomic approach for safe minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer.
Kong TW; Son JH; Paek J; Chang SJ; Ryu HS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):e7. PubMed ID: 31788997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival following minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for patients with cervical carcinoma and tumor size ≤2 cm.
Nasioudis D; Albright BB; Haggerty AF; Ko EM; Kim SH; Morgan MA; Latif NA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 224(3):317-318.e2. PubMed ID: 33129764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Solution to prevent tumor spillage in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy using the endoscopic stapler for treating early-stage cervical cancer: Surgical technique with video.
Mun J; Park SJ; Yim GW; Chang SJ; Kim H;
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Dec; 50(10):102211. PubMed ID: 34481135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Protective Maneuver to Avoid Tumor Spillage during Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Vaginal Cuff Closure.
Lago V; Tiermes M; Padilla-Iserte P; Matute L; Gurrea M; Domingo S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):174-175. PubMed ID: 32540498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radical Hysterectomy and Age: Outcomes Comparison Based on a Minimally Invasive vs an Open Approach.
Dos Reis R; Andrade CEMC; Frumovitz M; Munsell M; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(7):1224-1230. PubMed ID: 29530834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerve-Sparing Approach Improves Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bogani G; Rossetti DO; Ditto A; Signorelli M; Martinelli F; Mosca L; Scaffa C; Leone Roberti Maggiore U; Chiappa V; Sabatucci I; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(3):402-410. PubMed ID: 29191471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
