BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32747980)

  • 1. PSA-based machine learning model improves prostate cancer risk stratification in a screening population.
    Perera M; Mirchandani R; Papa N; Breemer G; Effeindzourou A; Smith L; Swindle P; Smith E
    World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1897-1902. PubMed ID: 32747980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advancing Traditional Prostate-specific Antigen Kinetics in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Machine Learning Model.
    Perera M; Smith L; Thompson I; Breemer G; Papa N; Patel MI; Swindle P; Smith E
    Eur Urol Focus; 2022 Sep; 8(5):1204-1210. PubMed ID: 34920976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of an imageless machine-learning algorithm for the initial screening of prostate cancer.
    Martelin N; De Witt B; Chen B; Eschwège P
    Prostate; 2024 Jun; 84(9):842-849. PubMed ID: 38571454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying prostate cancer and its clinical risk in asymptomatic men using machine learning of high dimensional peripheral blood flow cytometric natural killer cell subset phenotyping data.
    Hood SP; Cosma G; Foulds GA; Johnson C; Reeder S; McArdle SE; Khan MA; Pockley AG
    Elife; 2020 Jul; 9():. PubMed ID: 32717179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The comparability of models for predicting the risk of a positive prostate biopsy with prostate-specific antigen alone: a systematic review.
    Schröder F; Kattan MW
    Eur Urol; 2008 Aug; 54(2):274-90. PubMed ID: 18511177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The percentage of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform [-2]proPSA and the Prostate Health Index improve the diagnostic accuracy for clinically relevant prostate cancer at initial and repeat biopsy compared with total PSA and percentage free PSA in men aged ≤65 years.
    Boegemann M; Stephan C; Cammann H; Vincendeau S; Houlgatte A; Jung K; Blanchet JS; Semjonow A
    BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 25818705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Combination of Prostate Cancer Antigen 3 and Prostate-Specific Antigen Improves Diagnostic Accuracy in Men at Risk of Prostate Cancer.
    Cao L; Lee CH; Ning J; Handy BC; Wagar EA; Meng QH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2018 Sep; 142(9):1106-1112. PubMed ID: 29547000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
    Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
    J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stratification model based on early postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen kinetics may help to reduce the risk of overtreatment in candidates for adjuvant radiotherapy.
    Vesely S; Jarolim L; Schmidt M; Do Carmo Silva J; Duskova K; Babjuk M
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Apr; 51(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 28635569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test: a review of current evidence.
    Hayes JH; Barry MJ
    JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(11):1143-9. PubMed ID: 24643604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of serum isoform [-2]proPSA derivatives shows superior accuracy to magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with a total prostate-specific antigen level of 2-10 ng/ml.
    Furuya K; Kawahara T; Narahara M; Tokita T; Fukui S; Imano M; Mitome T; Ito Y; Izumi K; Osaka K; Yokomizo Y; Hayashi N; Hasumi H; Nawata S; Kawano T; Yao M; Uemura H
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Aug; 51(4):251-257. PubMed ID: 28351193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
    Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
    Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparative performance analysis of total prostate-specific antigen, percentage free prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen velocity and urinary prostate cancer gene 3 in the first, second and third repeat prostate biopsy.
    Auprich M; Augustin H; Budäus L; Kluth L; Mannweiler S; Shariat SF; Fisch M; Graefen M; Pummer K; Chun FK
    BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1627-35. PubMed ID: 21939492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement of insulin-like growth factor axis does not enhance specificity of PSA-based prostate cancer screening.
    Oliver SE; Holly J; Peters TJ; Donovan J; Persad R; Gillatt D; Pearce A; Hamdy FC; Neal DE; Gunnell D
    Urology; 2004 Aug; 64(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 15302487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in serum prostate-specific antigen levels and the identification of prostate cancer in a large managed care population.
    Wallner LP; Frencher SK; Hsu JW; Chao CR; Nichol MB; Loo RK; Jacobsen SJ
    BJU Int; 2013 Jun; 111(8):1245-52. PubMed ID: 23320750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of multiphase nonlinear mixed models to define and quantify long-term changes in serum prostate-specific antigen: data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.
    Shoaibi A; Rao GA; Cai B; Rawl J; Hébert JR
    Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):36-42.e1-2. PubMed ID: 26611771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Automated Micro-Total Immunoassay System for Measuring Cancer-Associated α2,3-linked Sialyl N-Glycan-Carrying Prostate-Specific Antigen May Improve the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
    Ishikawa T; Yoneyama T; Tobisawa Y; Hatakeyama S; Kurosawa T; Nakamura K; Narita S; Mitsuzuka K; Duivenvoorden W; Pinthus JH; Hashimoto Y; Koie T; Habuchi T; Arai Y; Ohyama C
    Int J Mol Sci; 2017 Feb; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 28241428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinico-radiological characteristic-based machine learning in reducing unnecessary prostate biopsies of PI-RADS 3 lesions with dual validation.
    Kan Y; Zhang Q; Hao J; Wang W; Zhuang J; Gao J; Huang H; Liang J; Marra G; Calleris G; Oderda M; Zhao X; Gontero P; Guo H
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6274-6284. PubMed ID: 32524222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: findings from the initial screening round of a randomized trial.
    Andriole GL; Levin DL; Crawford ED; Gelmann EP; Pinsky PF; Chia D; Kramer BS; Reding D; Church TR; Grubb RL; Izmirlian G; Ragard LR; Clapp JD; Prorok PC; Gohagan JK;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 15770007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Defined Prostate-Specific Antigen Density Significantly Improves the Risk Prediction for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
    Bhat NR; Vetter JM; Andriole GL; Shetty AS; Ippolito JE; Kim EH
    Urology; 2019 Apr; 126():152-157. PubMed ID: 30580005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.