190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32749026)
1. Influence of selective caries excavation on marginal penetration of class II composite restorations in vitro.
Scholz KJ; Hinderberger M; Widbiller M; Federlin M; Hiller KA; Buchalla W
Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Oct; 128(5):405-414. PubMed ID: 32749026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
Schuckar M; Geurtsen W
J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations.
Haller B; Trojanski A
Clin Oral Investig; 1998 Sep; 2(3):130-6. PubMed ID: 9927914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries.
Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu IF; Antonson SA; Campillo-Funollet M; Antonson D; Munoz-Viveros C
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of using different bonding systems and composites on the margin integrity and the mechanical properties of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
Schwendicke F; Kern M; Dörfer C; Kleemann-Lüpkes J; Paris S; Blunck U
J Dent; 2015 Mar; 43(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 25556352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Restorations Assessed Using Microcomputed Tomography and Scanning Electron Microscope.
Rengo C; Goracci C; Ametrano G; Chieffi N; Spagnuolo G; Rengo S; Ferrari M
Oper Dent; 2015; 40(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 25602350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal quality and microleakage of adhesive class V restorations.
Manhart J; Chen HY; Mehl A; Weber K; Hickel R
J Dent; 2001 Feb; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 11239587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations.
Ferrari M; Mason PN; Fabianelli A; Cagidiaco MC; Kugel G; Davidson CL
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):134-42. PubMed ID: 10649936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
Dietrich T; Lösche AC; Lösche GM; Roulet JF
J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
