These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32749155)

  • 1. A Broader Application of the Detection Response Task to Cognitive Tasks and Online Environments.
    Innes RJ; Evans NJ; Howard ZL; Eidels A; Brown SD
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):896-909. PubMed ID: 32749155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of auditory detection response task method for assessing the attentional effects of cognitive load.
    Stojmenova K; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jul; 19(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 29461865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity evaluation of the visual, tactile, and auditory detection response task method while driving.
    Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 May; 18(4):431-436. PubMed ID: 27588336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling cognitive load effects of conversation between a passenger and driver.
    Tillman G; Strayer D; Eidels A; Heathcote A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Aug; 79(6):1795-1803. PubMed ID: 28537009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the Cost of Detection Response Task Performance on Cognitive Load.
    Biondi FN; Balasingam B; Ayare P
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):804-812. PubMed ID: 32552116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the selection of stimulus for the auditory variant of the detection response task method for driving experiments.
    Stojmenova K; Policardi F; Sodnik J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan; 19(1):23-27. PubMed ID: 28594238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive workload measurement and modeling under divided attention.
    Castro SC; Strayer DL; Matzke D; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):826-839. PubMed ID: 30998070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Increased Visual Information on Cognitive Workload in a Helicopter Simulator.
    Innes RJ; Howard ZL; Thorpe A; Eidels A; Brown SD
    Hum Factors; 2021 Aug; 63(5):788-803. PubMed ID: 32783536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An analysis of the suitability of a low-cost eye tracker for assessing the cognitive load of drivers.
    Čegovnik T; Stojmenova K; Jakus G; Sodnik J
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Apr; 68():1-11. PubMed ID: 29409621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring driver distraction - Evaluation of the box task method as a tool for assessing in-vehicle system demand.
    Morgenstern T; Wögerbauer EM; Naujoks F; Krems JF; Keinath A
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Oct; 88():103181. PubMed ID: 32678787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optic Flow and Tunnel Vision in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2019 Sep; 61(6):992-1003. PubMed ID: 30707630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing Cognitive Distraction in the Automobile.
    Strayer DL; Turrill J; Cooper JM; Coleman JR; Medeiros-Ward N; Biondi F
    Hum Factors; 2015 Dec; 57(8):1300-24. PubMed ID: 26534847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relative impact of smartwatch and smartphone use while driving on workload, attention, and driving performance.
    Perlman D; Samost A; Domel AG; Mehler B; Dobres J; Reimer B
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():8-16. PubMed ID: 30509540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Driving simulator scenarios and measures to faithfully evaluate risky driving behavior: A comparative study of different driver age groups.
    Michaels J; Chaumillon R; Nguyen-Tri D; Watanabe D; Hirsch P; Bellavance F; Giraudet G; Bernardin D; Faubert J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185909. PubMed ID: 29016693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Task performance and eye activity: predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload.
    Tsai YF; Viirre E; Strychacz C; Chase B; Jung TP
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B176-85. PubMed ID: 17547318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic workload measurement and modeling: Driving and conversing.
    Castro SC; Heathcote A; Cooper JM; Strayer DL
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2023 Sep; 29(3):645-653. PubMed ID: 35786943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive Load and Situation Awareness for Soldiers: Effects of Message Presentation Rate and Sensory Modality.
    Hollands JG; Spivak T; Kramkowski EW
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):763-773. PubMed ID: 30768371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity of physiological measures for detecting systematic variations in cognitive demand from a working memory task: an on-road study across three age groups.
    Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin JF
    Hum Factors; 2012 Jun; 54(3):396-412. PubMed ID: 22768642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Driver experience and cognitive workload in different traffic environments.
    Patten CJ; Kircher A; Ostlund J; Nilsson L; Svenson O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2006 Sep; 38(5):887-94. PubMed ID: 16620740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.