These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32749172)

  • 1. Method for protected noise exposure level assessment under an in-ear hearing protection device: a pilot study.
    Nadon V; Bonnet F; Bouserhal RE; Bernier A; Voix J
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 32749172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Tikka C; Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Ferrite S
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jul; 7(7):CD006396. PubMed ID: 28685503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.
    Verbeek JH; Kateman E; Morata TC; Dreschler WA; Mischke C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Oct; 10():CD006396. PubMed ID: 23076923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
    Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual Fit Testing of Hearing-Protection Devices Based on Microphones in Real Ears among Workers in Industries with High-Noise-Level Manufacturing.
    Chiu CC; Wan TJ
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32384734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Tester to Evaluate the Correct Placement of Earplugs.
    Kozlowski E; Mlynski R; Morzynski L; Swidzinski A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The role of information and training for workers on the correct use of earplugs in assessing real noise attenuation with E-A-RfitTM system].
    Cassano F; Aloise I; Labianca G; Gaccione V; Mazzotta C; Cardascia F; Garavaglia M; Germano C; Dentamaro A; Di Lorenzo L
    Med Lav; 2015 Jul; 106(4):284-93. PubMed ID: 26154471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
    Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring earplug noise attenuation: A comparison of laboratory and field methods.
    Karch SJ; Federman J; Ginsberg JT; Qureshi I
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2024 Jan; 21(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 37843505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessment of the impulse noise attenuation by earplugs in metalworking processes].
    Mlyński R; Kozlowski E
    Med Pr; 2014; 65(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 25090849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determining attenuation of impulse noise with an electrical equivalent of a hearing protection device.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 23498707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition in noise under hearing protection: A computational study of the combined effects of hearing loss and hearing protector attenuation.
    Giguère C; Berger EH
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S30-40. PubMed ID: 26840922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing Protector Attenuation and Noise Exposure Among Metal Manufacturing Workers.
    Sayler SK; Rabinowitz PM; Galusha D; Sun K; Neitzel RL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):680-689. PubMed ID: 30157082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers.
    Neitzel R; Seixas N
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 15788384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Noise dosimetry for tactical environments.
    Smalt CJ; Lacirignola J; Davis SK; Calamia PT; Collins PP
    Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 349():42-54. PubMed ID: 27876480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive factors of occupational noise-induced hearing loss in Spanish workers: A prospective study.
    Pelegrin AC; Canuet L; Rodríguez ÁA; Morales MP
    Noise Health; 2015; 17(78):343-9. PubMed ID: 26356377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety climate, hearing climate and hearing protection device use among transportation road maintainers.
    Cavallari JM; Burch KA; Hanrahan J; Garza JL; Dugan AG
    Am J Ind Med; 2019 Jul; 62(7):590-599. PubMed ID: 31104314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of hearing protection device effectiveness for musicians.
    Crawford K; Willenbring K; Nothwehr F; Fleckenstein S; Anthony TR
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Mar; 62(3):238-244. PubMed ID: 35143376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
    Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.