These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3274986)
1. [Epistemiological reflections on biological theories]. Delsol M Cellule; 1987; 74():21-39. PubMed ID: 3274986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The function debate in philosophy. Wouters A Acta Biotheor; 2005; 53(2):123-51. PubMed ID: 16049732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Biological introduction to the evolutionary (dialectic) level of science]. Cordón F Arch Neurobiol (Madr); 1967; 30(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 5606198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Why the problem of reductionism in biological science will not go away. Caplan AL Growth; 1987; 51(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 3623192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Twentieth Bowditch lecture. From Aristotle to modern computers. The role of theories in biological research. Coleman TG Physiologist; 1975 Nov; 18(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 1197388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fundamental questions in biology. Levin SA PLoS Biol; 2006 Sep; 4(9):e300. PubMed ID: 16968139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Complexity seems to open a way towards a new Aristotelian-Thomistic ontology. Strumia A Acta Biomed; 2007; 78 Suppl 1():32-8. PubMed ID: 17465322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Some trends in modern theoretical biology and the conception of a functional system]. Anokhin PK; Serzhantov VF Usp Fiziol Nauk; 1973; 4(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 4781313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital evolution. O'Neill B PLoS Biol; 2003 Oct; 1(1):E18. PubMed ID: 14551915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Philosophy of biology: about the fossilization of disciplines and other embryonic thoughts. Van Speybroeck L Acta Biotheor; 2007; 55(1):47-71. PubMed ID: 17619171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Embracing complexity: organicism for the 21st century. Gilbert SF; Sarkar S Dev Dyn; 2000 Sep; 219(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 10974666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current reflections on representation in biology. Introduction. Suárez E Hist Philos Life Sci; 2007; 29(2):141-3. PubMed ID: 18564508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring autonomy through computational biomodelling. Palfreyman N Brief Bioinform; 2009 Jul; 10(4):462-74. PubMed ID: 19276201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The phenogenetic logic of life. Weiss KM Nat Rev Genet; 2005 Jan; 6(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 15630420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Popper's critical rationalism and the biomedical sciences]. Havlícek J Cas Lek Cesk; 1993 Nov; 132(21):641-4. PubMed ID: 8269468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative epistemology: contours of a research program. Zwart H Acta Biotheor; 2005; 53(2):77-92. PubMed ID: 16049730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The future of evolutionary developmental biology. Holland PW Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6761 Suppl):C41-4. PubMed ID: 10591224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The rational design of biological complexity: a deceptive metaphor. Van Regenmortel MH Proteomics; 2007 Mar; 7(6):965-75. PubMed ID: 17370255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. From philosophy to science (to natural philosophy): evolutionary developmental perspectives. Love AC Q Rev Biol; 2008 Mar; 83(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 18481590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]