181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32750623)
1. Changes in the wing shape and size in Drosophila melanogaster treated with food grade titanium dioxide nanoparticles (E171) - A multigenerational study.
Cvetković VJ; Jovanović B; Lazarević M; Jovanović N; Savić-Zdravković D; Mitrović T; Žikić V
Chemosphere; 2020 Dec; 261():127787. PubMed ID: 32750623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of human food grade titanium dioxide nanoparticle dietary exposure on Drosophila melanogaster survival, fecundity, pupation and expression of antioxidant genes.
Jovanović B; Cvetković VJ; Mitrović TLj
Chemosphere; 2016 Feb; 144():43-9. PubMed ID: 26344147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genetic basis of wing morphogenesis in Drosophila: sexual dimorphism and non-allometric effects of shape variation.
Carreira VP; Soto IM; Mensch J; Fanara JJ
BMC Dev Biol; 2011 Jun; 11():32. PubMed ID: 21635778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genotoxic testing of titanium dioxide anatase nanoparticles using the wing-spot test and the comet assay in Drosophila.
Carmona ER; Escobar B; Vales G; Marcos R
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Jan; 778():12-21. PubMed ID: 25726144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of titanium dioxide nanocrystal-induced genotoxicity by the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay and the Drosophila wing spot test.
Reis Éde M; Rezende AA; Oliveira PF; Nicolella HD; Tavares DC; Silva AC; Dantas NO; Spanó MA
Food Chem Toxicol; 2016 Oct; 96():309-19. PubMed ID: 27562929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Plasticity of Drosophila melanogaster wing morphology: effects of sex, temperature and density.
Bitner-Mathé BC; Klaczko LB
Genetica; 1999; 105(2):203-10. PubMed ID: 10568261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vivo genotoxicity assessment of titanium, zirconium and aluminium nanoparticles, and their microparticulated forms, in Drosophila.
Demir E; Turna F; Vales G; Kaya B; Creus A; Marcos R
Chemosphere; 2013 Nov; 93(10):2304-10. PubMed ID: 24095613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Toxicity and genotoxicity in Drosophila melanogaster (SMART eye-spot test and comet assay in neuroblasts).
Sario S; Silva AM; Gaivão I
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2018 Jul; 831():19-23. PubMed ID: 29875073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.
Gidaszewski NA; Baylac M; Klingenberg CP
BMC Evol Biol; 2009 May; 9():110. PubMed ID: 19457235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The sex-limited effects of mutations in the EGFR and TGF-β signaling pathways on shape and size sexual dimorphism and allometry in the Drosophila wing.
Testa ND; Dworkin I
Dev Genes Evol; 2016 Jun; 226(3):159-71. PubMed ID: 27038022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of a human food additive, titanium dioxide nanoparticles E171, on Drosophila melanogaster - a 20 generation dietary exposure experiment.
Jovanović B; Jovanović N; Cvetković VJ; Matić S; Stanić S; Whitley EM; Mitrović TL
Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):17922. PubMed ID: 30560898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sexual dimorphism in Sturnira lilium (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae): can pregnancy and pup carrying be responsible for differences in wing shape?
de Camargo NF; de Oliveira HF
PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49734. PubMed ID: 23166759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trans-generational transmission of altered phenotype resulting from flubendiamide-induced changes in apoptosis in larval imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster.
Sarkar S; Khatun S; Dutta M; Roy S
Environ Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Dec; 56():350-360. PubMed ID: 29121551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between morphology and flight in Drosophila: a study of two pairs of sibling species from a natural population.
Flaibani N; Ortiz VE; Fanara JJ; Carreira VP
Insect Sci; 2024 Jun; 31(3):885-900. PubMed ID: 37689967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of a permanent magnetic field on wing size parameters in Drosophila melanogaster.
Stamenković-Radak M; Kitanović I; Prolić Z; Tomisić I; Stojković B; Andjelković M
Bioelectromagnetics; 2001 Jul; 22(5):365-9. PubMed ID: 11424161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cellular basis of morphological variation and temperature-related plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster strains with divergent wing shapes.
Torquato LS; Mattos D; Matta BP; Bitner-Mathé BC
Genetica; 2014 Dec; 142(6):495-505. PubMed ID: 25326715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wing morphometrics as a tool in species identification of forensically important blow flies of Thailand.
Sontigun N; Sukontason KL; Zajac BK; Zehner R; Sukontason K; Wannasan A; Amendt J
Parasit Vectors; 2017 May; 10(1):229. PubMed ID: 28486970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic variation for the positioning of wing veins in Drosophila melanogaster.
Birdsall K; Zimmerman E; Teeter K; Gibson G
Evol Dev; 2000; 2(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 11256413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape.
Gilchrist AS; Azevedo RB; Partridge L; O'Higgins P
Evol Dev; 2000; 2(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 11258389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Joint regulation of cell size and cell number in the wing blade of Drosophila melanogaster.
McCabe J; French V; Partridge L
Genet Res; 1997 Feb; 69(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 9164175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
