BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32753086)

  • 1. Mexican households' food shopping patterns in 2015: analysis following nonessential food and sugary beverage taxes.
    Pedraza LS; Popkin BM; Adair L; Robinson WR; Taillie LS
    Public Health Nutr; 2021 Jun; 24(8):2225-2237. PubMed ID: 32753086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mexican Households' Purchases of Foods and Beverages Vary by Store-Type, Taxation Status, and SES.
    Pedraza LS; Popkin BM; Salgado JC; Taillie LS
    Nutrients; 2018 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30096817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The caloric and sugar content of beverages purchased at different store-types changed after the sugary drinks taxation in Mexico.
    Pedraza LS; Popkin BM; Batis C; Adair L; Robinson WR; Guilkey DK; Taillie LS
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Nov; 16(1):103. PubMed ID: 31718664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. First-Year Evaluation of Mexico's Tax on Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods: An Observational Study.
    Batis C; Rivera JA; Popkin BM; Taillie LS
    PLoS Med; 2016 Jul; 13(7):e1002057. PubMed ID: 27379797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sugar-sweetened beverage purchases in urban Peru before the implementation of taxation and warning label policies: a baseline study.
    Lowery CM; Saavedra-Garcia L; Diez-Canseco F; Cárdenas MK; Miranda JJ; Taillie LS
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Dec; 22(1):2389. PubMed ID: 36539775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do high vs. low purchasers respond differently to a nonessential energy-dense food tax? Two-year evaluation of Mexico's 8% nonessential food tax.
    Taillie LS; Rivera JA; Popkin BM; Batis C
    Prev Med; 2017 Dec; 105S():S37-S42. PubMed ID: 28729195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.
    Silver LD; Ng SW; Ryan-Ibarra S; Taillie LS; Induni M; Miles DR; Poti JM; Popkin BM
    PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002283. PubMed ID: 28419108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.
    Bleich SN; Dunn CG; Soto MJ; Yan J; Gibson LA; Lawman HG; Mitra N; Lowery CM; Peterhans A; Hua SV; Roberto CA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2113527. PubMed ID: 34129022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax.
    Colchero MA; Rivera-Dommarco J; Popkin BM; Ng SW
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2017 Mar; 36(3):564-571. PubMed ID: 28228484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Where people shop is not associated with the nutrient quality of packaged foods for any racial-ethnic group in the United States.
    Stern D; Poti JM; Ng SW; Robinson WR; Gordon-Larsen P; Popkin BM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2016 Apr; 103(4):1125-34. PubMed ID: 26912495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Dietary Intake Before vs After Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Nonessential Energy-Dense Foods in Mexico, 2012 to 2018.
    Batis C; Castellanos-Gutiérrez A; Sánchez-Pimienta TG; Reyes-García A; Colchero MA; Basto-Abreu A; Barrientos-Gutiérrez T; Rivera JA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Jul; 6(7):e2325191. PubMed ID: 37486629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Did high sugar-sweetened beverage purchasers respond differently to the excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Mexico?
    Ng SW; Rivera JA; Popkin BM; Colchero MA
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Mar; 22(4):750-756. PubMed ID: 30560754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study.
    Colchero MA; Popkin BM; Rivera JA; Ng SW
    BMJ; 2016 Jan; 352():h6704. PubMed ID: 26738745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Urban vs. Rural Socioeconomic Differences in the Nutritional Quality of Household Packaged Food Purchases by Store Type.
    Lacko A; Ng SW; Popkin B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33092077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Targeted Beverage Taxes Influence Food and Beverage Purchases among Households with Preschool Children.
    Ford CN; Ng SW; Popkin BM
    J Nutr; 2015 Aug; 145(8):1835-43. PubMed ID: 26063069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Socioeconomic Disparities in Intakes and Purchases of Less-Healthy Foods and Beverages Have Changed over Time in Urban Mexico.
    López-Olmedo N; Popkin BM; Taillie LS
    J Nutr; 2018 Jan; 148(1):109-116. PubMed ID: 29378043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nutritional Profile of Purchases by Store Type: Disparities by Income and Food Program Participation.
    Taillie LS; Grummon AH; Miles DR
    Am J Prev Med; 2018 Aug; 55(2):167-177. PubMed ID: 29910116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of Chile's Law of Food Labeling and Advertising on sugar-sweetened beverage purchases from 2015 to 2017: A before-and-after study.
    Taillie LS; Reyes M; Colchero MA; Popkin B; Corvalán C
    PLoS Med; 2020 Feb; 17(2):e1003015. PubMed ID: 32045424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of a Sweetened Beverage Tax on Beverage Volume Sold in Cook County, Illinois, and Its Border Area.
    Powell LM; Leider J; Léger PT
    Ann Intern Med; 2020 Mar; 172(6):390-397. PubMed ID: 32092766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Changes in Grams of Sugar Sold After the Implementation of the Seattle Sweetened Beverage Tax.
    Powell LM; Leider J; Oddo VM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132271. PubMed ID: 34739061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.