These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32753335)

  • 1. Teeth angulations after class II treatment with the Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances: A retrospective panoramic analysis.
    Bellini-Pereira SA; Sant'Anna GQ; Wagner MC; Aliaga-DelCastillo A; Patel MP; Henriques JFC; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):436-442. PubMed ID: 32753335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of the dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes with the cervical headgear and Jones Jig followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
    Fontes FPH; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del-Castillo A; Patel MP; Freitas MR; Henriques JFC; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):424-435. PubMed ID: 32278665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cephalometric effects of the Jones Jig appliance followed by fixed appliances in Class II malocclusion treatment.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; Freitas KM; Grec RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(3):44-51. PubMed ID: 25162565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Class II malocclusion treatment changes with the Jones jig, Distal jet and First Class appliances.
    Vilanova L; Henriques JFC; Patel MP; Reis RS; Grec RHDC; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Bellini-Pereira SA; Janson G
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2020; 28():e20190364. PubMed ID: 32348442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Class II malocclusion treatment effects with Jones Jig and Distal Jet followed by fixed appliances.
    Vilanova L; Henriques JFC; Janson G; Patel MP; Reis RS; Aliaga-Del Castillo A
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jan; 88(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 28985105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative cephalometric study of Class II malocclusion treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig appliances followed by fixed corrective orthodontics.
    Patel MP; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Janson G; de Freitas MR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(6):58-64. PubMed ID: 24351151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stability of class II treatment with Pendulum and Jones jig followed by fixed appliances.
    Patel MP; Henriques JFC; Freitas KMS; Almeida R; Janson G
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Aug; 24(3):370-378. PubMed ID: 33259104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Jones jig appliance for distal molar movement.
    Brickman CD; Sinha PK; Nanda RS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Nov; 118(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 11094366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances.
    Patel MP; Janson G; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; de Freitas KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):336-42. PubMed ID: 19268832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer.
    Keles A; Sayinsu K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 10629518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of molar distalization therapy with erupted second molar: Segmented versus Quad Pendulum appliance.
    Caprioglio A; Cozzani M; Fontana M
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):49. PubMed ID: 25139288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of treatment including second molars on final and postretention molar angulation.
    Canuto LF; de Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Cançado RH
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(5):121-7. PubMed ID: 24352398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
    Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
    de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary molar distalization in treatment of angle class II malocclusion growing patients: Uncontrolled clinical trial.
    Abdelhady NA; Tawfik MA; Hammad SM
    Int Orthod; 2020 Mar; 18(1):96-104. PubMed ID: 31974060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes of class II malocclusion treatment with modified first class appliances: a prospective clinical trial.
    Anraki CC; Campos CBA; Sant'Anna GQ; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Grec R; Henriques JFC; Garib D
    Eur J Orthod; 2023 Mar; 45(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 36331520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
    Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
    Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
    Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.