These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32753353)

  • 1. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Rates in Québec: Trends Over the Last Decade and Predictors of Technicity.
    Bergeron AM; Chen I; Laberge PY; Maheux-Lacroix S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Dec; 42(12):1469-1474. PubMed ID: 32753353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Development of technicality indices of hysterectomies in Quebec].
    Bernatchez-Laflamme SM; Bujold E; Roberge S; Laberge PY
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):144-148. PubMed ID: 23470064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical approach to hysterectomy: introducing the concept of technicity.
    Laberge PY; Singh SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2009 Nov; 31(11):1050-1053. PubMed ID: 20175344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technicity in Canada: A Nationwide Whole-Population Analysis of Temporal Trends and Variation in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomies.
    Chen I; Mallick R; Allaire C; Bajzak KI; Belland LM; Bougie O; Cassell KA; Choudhry AJ; Cundiff GW; Kroft J; Leyland NA; Maheux-Lacroix S; Rajakumar C; Randle E; Robertson D; Thiel JA; Tulandi T; Yong PJ; Laberge PY;
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):1041-1050. PubMed ID: 33476750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increasing the Technicity Index to 92% in a Community Hospital: A 5-Year Retrospective Review.
    Mui J; Gottenbos L; Liu C; Hejazi S; Mohtashami F
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Dec; 41(12):1709-1716. PubMed ID: 30948338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications.
    Mehta A; Xu T; Hutfless S; Makary MA; Sinno AK; Tanner EJ; Stone RL; Wang K; Fader AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 May; 216(5):497.e1-497.e10. PubMed ID: 28034651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Power Morcellation Trends in a West Coast Integrated Health System.
    Zaritsky E; Tucker LY; Neugebauer R; Chou T; Flanagan T; Walter AJ; Raine-Bennett T
    Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 129(6):996-1005. PubMed ID: 28486359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technicity as a quality indicator of excellence in gynaecology.
    Al-Khaduri M; Al-Farsi Y
    Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J; 2012 Feb; 12(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 22375264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Harris MB; Olive DL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 171(2):340-3; discussion 343-4. PubMed ID: 8059810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does laparoscopy safely improve technicity for complex hysterectomy cases?
    Grant-Orser A; El Sugy R; Singh SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Mar; 36(3):248-252. PubMed ID: 24612894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of surgical volume on route of hysterectomy and short-term morbidity.
    Boyd LR; Novetsky AP; Curtin JP
    Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Oct; 116(4):909-915. PubMed ID: 20859155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of bowel preparation does not reduce postoperative infectious morbidity following minimally invasive or open hysterectomies.
    Kalogera E; Van Houten HK; Sangaralingham LR; Borah BJ; Dowdy SC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):231.e1-231.e12. PubMed ID: 32112733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative analysis of hysterectomies].
    Aniuliene R; Varzgaliene L; Varzgalis M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2007; 43(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 17329946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
    Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: What Have We Learned from a Decade?
    Carbonnel M; Moawad GN; Tarazi MM; Revaux A; Kennel T; Favre-Inhofer A; Ayoubi JM
    JSLS; 2021; 25(1):. PubMed ID: 33879990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive specialists and rates of laparoscopic hysterectomy.
    Loring M; Morris SN; Isaacson KB
    JSLS; 2015; 19(1):e2014.00221. PubMed ID: 25848189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review.
    Krizova A; Clarke BA; Bernardini MQ; James S; Kalloger SE; Boerner SL; Mulligan AM
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jan; 35(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 21164295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Increasing Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Canadian Academic Health Centre Experience.
    Gale J; Cameron C; Chen I; Guo Y; Singh SS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 Feb; 38(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 27032738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.