These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32754862)

  • 1. Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?
    Kaesler M; Dunn JC; Ransom K; Semmler C
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Aug; 5(1):35. PubMed ID: 32754862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clarifying the effects of sequential item presentation in the police lineup task.
    Kaesler M; Dunn JC; Semmler C
    Cognition; 2024 Sep; 250():105840. PubMed ID: 38908303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups.
    Lee J; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics.
    Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J
    Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Models of lineup memory.
    Wixted JT; Vul E; Mickes L; Wilson BM
    Cogn Psychol; 2018 Sep; 105():81-114. PubMed ID: 30032063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts.
    Colloff MF; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distinguishing Between Investigator Discriminability and Eyewitness Discriminability: A Method for Creating Full Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves of Lineup Identification Performance.
    Smith AM; Yang Y; Wells GL
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 32375014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Eyewitness confidence in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a criterion shift account for sequential mistaken identification overconfidence.
    Dobolyi DG; Dodson CS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2013 Dec; 19(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 24188335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators.
    Carlson CA; Hemby JA; Wooten AR; Jones AR; Lockamyeir RF; Carlson MA; Dias JL; Whittington JE
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Mar; 6(1):14. PubMed ID: 33660118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: a dual-process signal detection theory analysis.
    Meissner CA; Tredoux CG; Parker JF; MacLin OH
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):783-92. PubMed ID: 16383167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of lineup size on the processes underlying eyewitness decisions.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):17190. PubMed ID: 37821465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists.
    Finley JR; Wixted JT; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):903-919. PubMed ID: 32222916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data.
    Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):278-300. PubMed ID: 32700238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration.
    MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A perceptual scaling approach to eyewitness identification.
    Gepshtein S; Wang Y; He F; Diep D; Albright TD
    Nat Commun; 2020 Jul; 11(1):3380. PubMed ID: 32665586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enabling witnesses to actively explore faces and reinstate study-test pose during a lineup increases discriminability.
    Meyer M; Colloff MF; Bennett TC; Hirata E; Kohl A; Stevens LM; Smith HMJ; Staudigl T; Flowe HD
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301845120. PubMed ID: 37782811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling face similarity in police lineups.
    Shen KJ; Colloff MF; Vul E; Wilson BM; Wixted JT
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Mar; 130(2):432-461. PubMed ID: 36548056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification.
    Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability.
    Smith AM; Wells GL; Lindsay RC; Penrod SD
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Apr; 41(2):127-145. PubMed ID: 27685645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.