208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32755155)
1. The Negative Predictive Value of a PI-RADS Version 2 Score of 1 on Prostate MRI and the Factors Associated With a False-Negative MRI Study.
Ma HY; Ahmed FS; Luk L; Martina LAP; Wenske S; Shaish H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):667-672. PubMed ID: 32755155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System versions 1 and 2 for the Detection of Peripheral Zone Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Cancers.
Krishna S; McInnes M; Lim C; Lim R; Hakim SW; Flood TA; Schieda N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):W365-W373. PubMed ID: 28981356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. PI-RADS Version 2: Detection of Clinically Significant Cancer in Patients With Biopsy Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer.
Seo JW; Shin SJ; Taik Oh Y; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Park SY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W1-W9. PubMed ID: 28418690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion MRI to PI-RADS for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Tavakoli AA; Hielscher T; Badura P; Görtz M; Kuder TA; Gnirs R; Schwab C; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
Radiology; 2023 Jan; 306(1):186-199. PubMed ID: 35972360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.
Schaudinn A; Gawlitza J; Mucha S; Linder N; Franz T; Horn LC; Kahn T; Busse H
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():180-185. PubMed ID: 31153562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Associated With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 (Equivocal) Lesions Identified on Multiparametric Prostate MRI.
Sheridan AD; Nath SK; Syed JS; Aneja S; Sprenkle PC; Weinreb JC; Spektor M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Feb; 210(2):347-357. PubMed ID: 29112469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System, Version 2, on MRI Diagnosis for Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer.
Matsuoka Y; Ishioka J; Tanaka H; Kimura T; Yoshida S; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kihara K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Aug; 209(2):W76-W84. PubMed ID: 28570124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.
Gaur S; Harmon S; Rosenblum L; Greer MD; Mehralivand S; Coskun M; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jul; 211(1):W33-W41. PubMed ID: 29733695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PI-RADS Versions 2 and 2.1: Interobserver Agreement and Diagnostic Performance in Peripheral and Transition Zone Lesions Among Six Radiologists.
Bhayana R; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Bradley WR; Gottumukkala RV; Mojtahed A; Pierce TT; Harisinghani M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jul; 217(1):141-151. PubMed ID: 32903060
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Interreader Agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 Using an In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy Cohort: A Single Institution's Initial Experience.
Glazer DI; Mayo-Smith WW; Sainani NI; Sadow CA; Vangel MG; Tempany CM; Dunne RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):W145-W151. PubMed ID: 28657843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with prostate imaging reporting and data system score.
Martorana E; Pirola GM; Scialpi M; Micali S; Iseppi A; Bonetti LR; Kaleci S; Torricelli P; Bianchi G
BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 27608292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Application of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADS v2): Interobserver Agreement and Positive Predictive Value for Localization of Intermediate- and High-Grade Prostate Cancers on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen F; Cen S; Palmer S
Acad Radiol; 2017 Sep; 24(9):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 28546032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep Learning-Based T2-Weighted MR Image Quality Assessment and Its Impact on Prostate Cancer Detection Rates.
Lin Y; Belue MJ; Yilmaz EC; Harmon SA; An J; Law YM; Hazen L; Garcia C; Merriman KM; Phelps TE; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jun; 59(6):2215-2223. PubMed ID: 37811666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk Stratification Among Men With Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 Category 3 Transition Zone Lesions: Is Biopsy Always Necessary?
Felker ER; Raman SS; Margolis DJ; Lu DSK; Shaheen N; Natarajan S; Sharma D; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Dec; 209(6):1272-1277. PubMed ID: 28858541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients.
Washino S; Okochi T; Saito K; Konishi T; Hirai M; Kobayashi Y; Miyagawa T
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):225-233. PubMed ID: 26935594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predictive value of PI-RADS classification in MRI-directed transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.
NiMhurchu E; O'Kelly F; Murphy IG; Lavelle LP; Collins CD; Lennon G; Galvin D; Mulvin D; Quinlan D; McMahon CJ
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):375-80. PubMed ID: 26880299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of prostate cancer in PI-RADS version 2.1 T2-weighted transition zone 'nodule in nodule' and 'homogeneous mildly hypointense area between nodules' criteria: MRI-radical prostatectomy histopathological evaluation.
Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Flood TA; Carrion I; Dallaire FB; Schieda N
Eur Radiol; 2021 Oct; 31(10):7792-7801. PubMed ID: 33782767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Classification of Cancer at Prostate MRI: Deep Learning versus Clinical PI-RADS Assessment.
Schelb P; Kohl S; Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kickingereder P; Bickelhaupt S; Kuder TA; Stenzinger A; Hohenfellner M; Schlemmer HP; Maier-Hein KH; Bonekamp D
Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):607-617. PubMed ID: 31592731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing a nomogram based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for forecasting high-grade prostate cancer to reduce unnecessary biopsies within the prostate-specific antigen gray zone.
Niu XK; Li J; Das SK; Xiong Y; Yang CB; Peng T
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 28143433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
