248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32755196)
1. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Satapathy S; Singh H; Kumar R; Mittal BR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):599-607. PubMed ID: 32755196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gallium-68 Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced Prostate Cancer-Updated Diagnostic Utility, Sensitivity, Specificity, and Distribution of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-avid Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Perera M; Papa N; Roberts M; Williams M; Udovicich C; Vela I; Christidis D; Bolton D; Hofman MS; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG
Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):403-417. PubMed ID: 30773328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the Staging/Restaging Performance of 68Ga-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen and 18F-Choline PET/CT in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lin CY; Lee MT; Lin CL; Kao CH
Clin Nucl Med; 2019 May; 44(5):365-376. PubMed ID: 30888999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
Zhou J; Wu R; Wang W; Zhao Y; Liu X
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 36576728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Head-To-Head Comparison of
Zhao G; Ji B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):386-395. PubMed ID: 35441529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary lymph-node staging with
Corona-Montes VE; González-Cuenca E; Fernández-Noyola G; Olarte-Casas MA; Bobadilla-Salazar D; Medrano-Urtecho HM; Asimakopoulos AD
Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):494.e1-494.e6. PubMed ID: 33223371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic accuracy of
Liu X; Wang Q; Zhang B; Jiang T; Zeng W
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 35388806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The meta-analysis of the effect of 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT diagnosis of prostatic cancer compared with bone scan.
Zhao R; Li Y; Nie L; Qin K; Zhang H; Shi H
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(15):e25417. PubMed ID: 33847640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of PSMA PET/CT imaging in restaging of prostate cancer patients with low prostate-specific antigen levels.
Kabasakal L; Demirci E; Nematyazar J; Akyel R; Razavi B; Ocak M; Aygun A; Obek C; Kural AR
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Feb; 38(2):149-155. PubMed ID: 27893589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
Wang R; Shen G; Yang R; Ma X; Tian R
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130():109131. PubMed ID: 32622250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. PET/CT With
Giovacchini G; Giovannini E; Riondato M; Ciarmiello A
Curr Radiopharm; 2018; 11(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 29090673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Potential Impact of
Calais J; Kishan AU; Cao M; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Herrmann K; Ceci F; Reiter RE; Rettig MB; Hegde JV; Shaverdian N; King CR; Steinberg ML; Czernin J; Nickols NG
J Nucl Med; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1714-1721. PubMed ID: 29653978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of preoperative locoregional Ga-68 PSMA-11 PET-CT and mp-MRI results with postoperative histopathology of prostate cancer.
Yilmaz B; Turkay R; Colakoglu Y; Baytekin HF; Ergul N; Sahin S; Tugcu V; Inci E; Tasci AI; Cermik TF
Prostate; 2019 Jun; 79(9):1007-1017. PubMed ID: 31012125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictors of Positive
Perera M; Papa N; Christidis D; Wetherell D; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Bolton D; Lawrentschuk N
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):926-937. PubMed ID: 27363387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Histopathologically Validated Diagnostic Accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT in the Primary and Secondary Staging of Prostate Cancer and the Impact of PSMA-PET/CT on Clinical Management: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Jeet V; Parkinson B; Song R; Sharma R; Hoyle M
Semin Nucl Med; 2023 Sep; 53(5):706-718. PubMed ID: 37005145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does bone scintigraphy still have a role in the era of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer?
Simsek DH; Sanli Y; Civan C; Engin MN; Isik EG; Ozkan ZG; Kuyumcu S
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Jul; 34(7):476-485. PubMed ID: 32394269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
