These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32757573)
1. Cowitness identification speed affects choices from target-absent photospreads. Douglass AB; Lucas CA; Brewer N Law Hum Behav; 2020 Dec; 44(6):474-484. PubMed ID: 32757573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A problem with double-blind photospread procedures: photospread administrators use one eyewitness's confidence to influence the identification of another eyewitness. Douglass AB; Smith C; Fraser-Thill R Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):543-62. PubMed ID: 16254742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can Lineup Administrators Blind to the Suspect's Identity Influence Witnesses' Decisions? McCallum NA; Brewer N Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 31984009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Eyewitness misidentification: single vs. double-blind comparison of photospread administration. Perlini AH; Silvaggio AD Psychol Rep; 2007 Feb; 100(1):247-56. PubMed ID: 17451032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Providing witnesses with an option to say "I'm not sure" to a showup neither improves classification performance nor the reliability of suspect identifications. Jalava ST; Smith AM; Mackovichova S Law Hum Behav; 2021 Feb; 45(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 33734750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Administrator blindness affects the recording of eyewitness lineup outcomes. Rodriguez DN; Berry MA Law Hum Behav; 2020 Feb; 44(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 31535891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating investigators: examining witnesses' influence on investigators. Dahl LC; Lindsay DS; Brimacombe CA Law Hum Behav; 2006 Dec; 30(6):707-32. PubMed ID: 16741634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biased lineup instructions and face identification from video images. Thompson WB; Johnson J J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 18318406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instruction bias and lineup presentation moderate the effects of administrator knowledge on eyewitness identification. Greathouse SM; Kovera MB Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):70-82. PubMed ID: 18594956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast and confident: postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study. Sauerland M; Sporer SL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Mar; 15(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 19309216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Conformity among cowitnesses sharing same or different information about an event in experimental collaborative eyewitness testimony. Mori K; Mori H Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):275-90. PubMed ID: 18459377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Decision time and confidence predict choosers' identification performance in photographic showups. Sauerland M; Sagana A; Sporer SL; Wixted JT PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190416. PubMed ID: 29346394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Will your words become mine? underlying processes and cowitness intimacy in the memory conformity paradigm. Oeberst A; Seidemann J Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):84-96. PubMed ID: 24708407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using mug shots to find suspects. Lindsay RC; Nosworthy GJ; Martin R; Martynuck C J Appl Psychol; 1994 Feb; 79(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 8200869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. False alibi corroboration: witnesses lie for suspects who seem innocent, whether they like them or not. Marion SB; Burke TM Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 23339667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Witnessing-condition heterogeneity and witnesses' versus investigators' confidence in the accuracy of witnesses' identification decisions. Lindsay DS; Nilsen E; Read JD Law Hum Behav; 2000 Dec; 24(6):685-97. PubMed ID: 11105479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How variations in distance affect eyewitness reports and identification accuracy. Lindsay RC; Semmler C; Weber N; Brewer N; Lindsay MR Law Hum Behav; 2008 Dec; 32(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 18253819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The selective cue integration framework: a theory of postidentification witness confidence assessment. Charman SD; Carlucci M; Vallano J; Gregory AH J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Jun; 16(2):204-18. PubMed ID: 20565204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]