These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32757594)

  • 1. Salience determines attentional orienting in visual selection.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1051-1057. PubMed ID: 32757594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence against the low-salience account of attentional suppression.
    Stilwell BT; Egeth HE; Gaspelin N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Oct; 50(10):1033-1047. PubMed ID: 39172365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Salience effects on attentional selection are enabled by task relevance.
    Zhang Y; Gaspelin N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2024 Nov; 50(11):1131-1142. PubMed ID: 39311865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Suppression of overt attentional capture by salient-but-irrelevant color singletons.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 27804032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
    Gaspelin N; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ
    Psychol Sci; 2015 Nov; 26(11):1740-50. PubMed ID: 26420441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Top-Down Focused Spatial Attention in Preattentive Salience Coding and Salience-based Attentional Capture.
    Bertleff S; Fink GR; Weidner R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Aug; 28(8):1152-65. PubMed ID: 27054402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. P
    Drisdelle BL; Eimer M
    Psychophysiology; 2021 Sep; 58(9):e13878. PubMed ID: 34110022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.
    Pearson D; Watson P; Cheng PX; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 32191108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capture by Context Elements, Not Attentional Suppression of Distractors, Explains the P
    Kerzel D; Burra N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 32(6):1170-1183. PubMed ID: 31967520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Attentional suppression of highly salient color singletons.
    Stilwell BT; Gaspelin N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1313-1328. PubMed ID: 34766817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.
    Sawaki R; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1455-70. PubMed ID: 20675793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search.
    Hodsoll J; Mevorach C; Humphreys GW
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jan; 19(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 18515299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):13-17. PubMed ID: 29309194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamic inhibitory control prevents salience-driven capture of visual attention.
    Tay D; Jannati A; Green JJ; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Jan; 48(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 35073142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?
    Zhang B; Allenmark F; Liesefeld HR; Shi Z; Müller HJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1146-1163. PubMed ID: 31144860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Perceptual learning induces active suppression of physically nonsalient shapes.
    Hu L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13393. PubMed ID: 31087676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.
    Adam KCS; Serences JT
    J Neurosci; 2021 Sep; 41(38):8007-8022. PubMed ID: 34330776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.