BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

714 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32758491)

  • 1. Concordance of breast cancer biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry/in situ hybridization and Oncotype DX qRT-PCR with investigation of discordance, a study of 591 cases.
    Sechrist H; Glasgow A; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
    Hum Pathol; 2020 Oct; 104():54-65. PubMed ID: 32758491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing breast biomarker status between routine immunohistochemistry and FISH studies and Oncotype DX testing, a study of 610 cases.
    Neely C; You S; Mendoza PM; Aneja R; Sahin AA; Li X
    Breast J; 2018 Nov; 24(6):889-893. PubMed ID: 30230095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of Estrogen receptors, Progesterone receptors and HER2-neu immunohistochemistry results in breast cancer with those of Oncotype Dx.
    Sughayer MA; Alhassoon S; Sughayer HM
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Aug; 47():151556. PubMed ID: 32592992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ER and PR immunohistochemistry and HER2 FISH versus oncotype DX: implications for breast cancer treatment.
    Park MM; Ebel JJ; Zhao W; Zynger DL
    Breast J; 2014; 20(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 24261318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is oncotype DX recurrence score (RS) of prognostic value once HER2-positive and. low-ER expression patients are removed?
    Milburn M; Rosman M; Mylander C; Tafra L
    Breast J; 2013; 19(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 23701403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 results in concurrent ipsilateral samples with invasive breast carcinoma: a retrospective study of 246 biopsies from 119 patients.
    Singh K; Wang Y; Marketkar S; Kalife ET; Steinhoff MM
    Hum Pathol; 2017 Jul; 65():123-132. PubMed ID: 28457730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semi-quantitative immunohistochemical assay versus oncotype DX(®) qRT-PCR assay for estrogen and progesterone receptors: an independent quality assurance study.
    Kraus JA; Dabbs DJ; Beriwal S; Bhargava R
    Mod Pathol; 2012 Jun; 25(6):869-76. PubMed ID: 22301704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Breast Cancers, HER2 mRNA Levels Correlate Better with Clinicopathologic Features and Oncotype DX Recurrence Score than HER2 Immunohistochemistry.
    Tyburski H; Karakas C; Finkelman BS; Turner BM; Zhang H; Hicks DG
    Lab Invest; 2024 Mar; 104(3):100309. PubMed ID: 38135156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Is Oncotype DX testing informative for breast cancers with low ER expression? A retrospective review from a biomarker testing referral center.
    Loggie J; Barnes PJ; Carter MD; Rayson D; Bethune GC
    Breast; 2024 Jun; 75():103715. PubMed ID: 38520994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correlation between modified Magee equation-2 and Oncotype-Dx recurrence scores using both traditional and TAILORx cutoffs and the clinical application of the Magee Decision Algorithm: a single institutional review.
    Glasgow A; Sechrist H; Bomeisl P; Gilmore H; Harbhajanka A
    Breast Cancer; 2021 Mar; 28(2):321-328. PubMed ID: 32951186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relevance of progesterone receptor immunohistochemical staining to Oncotype DX recurrence score.
    Chaudhary LN; Jawa Z; Szabo A; Visotcky A; Chitambar CR
    Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther; 2016 Jun; 9(2):48-54. PubMed ID: 26808222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decalcification of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases With EDTA Does Not Affect ER, PR, and HER2 Results.
    van Es SC; van der Vegt B; Bensch F; Gerritse S; van Helden EJ; Boon E; Angus L; Overbosch J; Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW; Verheul HM; van Herpen CML; Jager A; Oosting SF; de Vries EGE; Schröder CP
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2019 Oct; 43(10):1355-1360. PubMed ID: 31283631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of Oncotype DX and TAILORx risk categories using histopathological and immunohistochemical markers by classification and regression tree (CART) analysis.
    Ingoldsby H; Webber M; Wall D; Scarrott C; Newell J; Callagy G
    Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):879-86. PubMed ID: 23643806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hormone receptor and HER2 assessment in breast carcinoma metastatic to bone: A comparison between FNA cell blocks and decalcified core needle biopsies.
    Zeng J; Piscuoglio S; Aggarwal G; Magda J; Friedlander MA; Murray M; Akram M; Reis-Filho JS; Weigelt B; Edelweiss M
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2020 Feb; 128(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 31883437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Oncotype DX in Bilateral Synchronous Primary Invasive Breast Cancer.
    Karsten M; Stempel M; Radosa J; Patil S; King TA
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):471-6. PubMed ID: 26340863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can features evaluated in the routine pathologic assessment of lymph node-negative estrogen receptor-positive stage I or II invasive breast cancer be used to predict the Oncotype DX recurrence score?
    Auerbach J; Kim M; Fineberg S
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2010 Nov; 134(11):1697-701. PubMed ID: 21043825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. HER2 equivocal breast cancer that is positive by alternative probe HER2 FISH are classified as HER2 negative by Oncotype DX.
    Tozbikian GH; Zynger DL
    Breast J; 2018 Jul; 24(4):535-540. PubMed ID: 29498449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes in conjunction with the 2007 St Gallen Consensus Statement for early breast cancer.
    Bauer K; Parise C; Caggiano V
    BMC Cancer; 2010 May; 10():228. PubMed ID: 20492696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Study of ER, PR, HER2/neu, p53, and Ki67 expression in primary breast carcinomas and synchronous metastatic axillary lymph nodes.
    Khande TA; Joshi AR; Khandeparkar SGS; Kulkarni MM; Gogate BP; Kakade AR; Sahu PD; Khillare CD
    Indian J Cancer; 2020; 57(2):190-197. PubMed ID: 32445323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression in breast cancer: correlation with clinical pathological features.
    Ning SF; Li JL; Luo CP; Wei CH; Lu YK; Liu HZ; Wei WE; Zhang LT
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(12):8740-7. PubMed ID: 25674240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.