These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32759243)

  • 1. Real-world outcomes comparison among adults with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation with a contact force porous tip catheter versus a second-generation cryoballoon catheter: a retrospective analysis of multihospital US database.
    Costea A; Goldstein L; Maccioni S; Kalsekar I; Khanna R
    BMJ Open; 2020 Aug; 10(8):e035499. PubMed ID: 32759243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atrial fibrillation ablation with advanced radiofrequency catheter versus second-generation cryoballoon catheter.
    Berman AE; Maccioni S; Khanna R
    J Comp Eff Res; 2022 Jun; 11(9):659-668. PubMed ID: 35535654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic impact of atrial fibrillation ablation with radiofrequency contact force catheter versus cryoballoon catheter.
    Pollak SJ; Goldstein L; Daskiran M; Kalsekar I; Khanna R
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Mar; 8(4):251-264. PubMed ID: 30572711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH catheter for ablation of atrial fibrillation: the relationship between hospital procedure volume, re-admissions, and economic outcomes.
    Barnow A; Goldstein L; Kalsekar I; Liao R; Khanna R
    J Med Econ; 2018 May; 21(5):481-487. PubMed ID: 29297705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Porous tip contact force-sensing catheters for pulmonary vein isolation: performance in a clinical routine setting.
    Plenge T; van den Bruck JH; Lüker J; Sultan A; Steven D
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2020 Mar; 57(2):251-259. PubMed ID: 31321659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-world safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with contact force or cryoballoon ablation.
    Natale A; Mohanty S; Goldstein L; Gomez T; Hunter TD
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Apr; 60(3):445-452. PubMed ID: 32390061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contact force sensing in ablation of ventricular arrhythmias using a 56-hole open-irrigation catheter: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Elbatran AI; Li A; Gallagher MM; Kaba R; Norman M; Behr ER; Sohal M; Bajpai A; Zuberi Z; Saba MM
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Apr; 60(3):543-553. PubMed ID: 32440943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Catheter ablation using the third-generation cryoballoon provides an enhanced ability to assess time to pulmonary vein isolation facilitating the ablation strategy: Short- and long-term results of a multicenter study.
    Aryana A; Kowalski M; O'Neill PG; Koo CH; Lim HW; Khan A; Hokanson RB; Bowers MR; Kenigsberg DN; Ellenbogen KA;
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Dec; 13(12):2306-2313. PubMed ID: 27503480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of real-world clinical and economic outcomes between the ThermoCool
    Chinitz L; Goldstein LJ; Barnow A; Maccioni S; Daskiran M; Kalsekar I; Khanna R
    Clinicoecon Outcomes Res; 2018; 10():587-599. PubMed ID: 30323636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Catheter ablation using advanced porous tip contact force-sensing radiofrequency catheter: Impact on health care utilization among patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Doshi A; Maccioni S; Preethi SM; Khanna R
    Heart Rhythm O2; 2022 Oct; 3(5):474-481. PubMed ID: 36340499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The best of two worlds? Pulmonary vein isolation using a novel radiofrequency ablation catheter incorporating contact force sensing technology and 56-hole porous tip irrigation.
    Maurer T; Rottner L; Makimoto H; Reissmann B; Heeger CH; Lemes C; Fink T; Riedl J; Santoro F; Wohlmuth P; Volkmer M; Mathew S; Metzner A; Ouyang F; Kuck KH; Sohns C
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Nov; 107(11):1003-1012. PubMed ID: 29740700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial clinical results with the ThermoCool® SmartTouch® Surround Flow catheter.
    Gonna H; Domenichini G; Zuberi Z; Norman M; Kaba R; Grimster A; Gallagher MM
    Europace; 2017 Aug; 19(8):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 27702870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ablation Index and Surround Flow Catheter Irrigation: Impedance-Based Appraisal in Clinical Ablation.
    Ullah W; Hunter RJ; Finlay MC; McLean A; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    JACC Clin Electrophysiol; 2017 Oct; 3(10):1080-1088. PubMed ID: 29759489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term safety and effectiveness of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation using a porous tip contact force-sensing catheter from the SMART SF trial.
    Natale A; Monir G; Patel AM; Fishel RS; Marchlinski FE; Delaughter MC; Athill CA; Melby DP; Gonzalez MD; Hariharan R; Gidney B; Tan T; Chinitz LA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2021 Jun; 61(1):63-69. PubMed ID: 32462550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Using Ablation Index Versus Second Generation Cryoballoon in the Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparison.
    Hussein A; Stabile G; Dawkins K; Spin P; Goldstein L; Wei T; Velleca M; Patel L; Gupta D
    Adv Ther; 2021 Aug; 38(8):4388-4402. PubMed ID: 34250584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy and safety comparison between different types of novel design enhanced open-irrigated ablation catheters in creating cavo-tricuspid isthmus block.
    Hamaya R; Miyazaki S; Kajiyama T; Watanabe T; Kusa S; Nakamura H; Hachiya H; Iesaka Y
    J Cardiol; 2018 May; 71(5):513-516. PubMed ID: 29239758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between radiofrequency with contact force-sensing and second-generation cryoballoon for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: a multicentre European evaluation.
    Squara F; Zhao A; Marijon E; Latcu DG; Providencia R; Di Giovanni G; Jauvert G; Jourda F; Chierchia GB; De Asmundis C; Ciconte G; Alonso C; Grimard C; Boveda S; Cauchemez B; Saoudi N; Brugada P; Albenque JP; Thomas O
    Europace; 2015 May; 17(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 25840289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost minimization analysis of catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation by catheter technology.
    Osorio J; Imhoff RJ; Mallow PJ; Hunter TD; Goldstein L; Rajendra A; Morales G
    J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Mar; 8(4):241-249. PubMed ID: 30628479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Impact of Left Atrial Surface Area and the Second Generation Cryoballoon on Clinical Outcome of Atrial Fibrillation Cryoablation.
    Greiss H; Berkowitsch A; Wojcik M; Zaltsberg S; Pajitnev D; Deubner N; Akkaya E; Güttler N; Hamm C; Neumann T; Kuniss M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 38(7):815-24. PubMed ID: 25851511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of acute procedural outcomes within four generations of cryoballoon catheters utilized in the real-world multicenter experience of 1STOP.
    Iacopino S; Pieragnoli P; Arena G; Sciarra L; Landolina M; Manfrin M; Verlato R; Solimene F; Sacchi R; Rebellato L; Rovaris G; Molon G; Infusino T; Tondo C
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2020 Jan; 31(1):80-88. PubMed ID: 31701569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.