182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3275983)
1. Palpable solid breast masses: retrospective single- and multimodality evaluation of 201 lesions.
van Dam PA; Van Goethem ML; Kersschot E; Vervliet J; Van den Veyver IB; De Schepper A; Buytaert P
Radiology; 1988 Feb; 166(2):435-9. PubMed ID: 3275983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted?
Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The value of aspiration cytology within the scope of triple diagnosis of palpable breast changes].
Schuhmann R; Hübner F; Brose C; Eckel S; Geier G; Kraus H; Schöndorf H; Schöndorf NK
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 8543127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Relevance of palpatory, mammographic and thermographic assessment criteria in benign and malignant structural changes in the female breast].
Bartl W; Pfersmann C; Schlögl H; Dadak C
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1986 Dec; 98(23):797-803. PubMed ID: 3027995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Palpable breast masses: evaluation by high frequency, hand-held real-time sonography and xeromammography. Work in progress.
Fleischer AC; Muhletaler CA; Reynolds VH; Machin JE; Thieme GA; Bundy AL; Winfield AC; James AE
Radiology; 1983 Sep; 148(3):813-7. PubMed ID: 6878706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Microwave thermography in the assessment of breast pathology].
Fogiel M; Zbroch T; Knapp P; Knapp P
Med Wieku Rozwoj; 2002; 6(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 12177514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Improvement of preoperative evaluation of palpable, noncystic processes of the breast by echomammography].
Leucht W; Rabe D; Müller A; von Fournier D; Humbert KD; Schmidt W
Ultraschall Med; 1985 Feb; 6(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 3887563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated and hand-held breast US: effect on patient management.
Bassett LW; Kimme-Smith C; Sutherland LK; Gold RH; Sarti D; King W
Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 3306779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women.
Harvey JA; Nicholson BT; Lorusso AP; Cohen MA; Bovbjerg VE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1723-30. PubMed ID: 19933671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review.
Moy L; Slanetz PJ; Moore R; Satija S; Yeh ED; McCarthy KA; Hall D; Staffa M; Rafferty EA; Halpern E; Kopans DB
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):176-81. PubMed ID: 12355002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. What ultrasonography can tell in breast masses that mammography and physical examination cannot.
Rosner D; Blaird D
J Surg Oncol; 1985 Apr; 28(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 3884906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.
Kolb TM; Lichy J; Newhouse JH
Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 12355001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Tactics in the complex examination of women with breast dysplasia and breast neoplasms].
Lindenbraten LD
Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1982 May; (5):8-15. PubMed ID: 7115531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Automated water-path full-breast sonography: correlation with histology of 176 solid lesions.
Egan RL; Egan KL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Sep; 143(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 6087645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy.
Wai CJ; Al-Mubarak G; Homer MJ; Goldkamp A; Samenfeld-Specht M; Lee Y; Logvinenko T; Rothschild JG; Graham RA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):850-5. PubMed ID: 23104707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Negative predictive value of sonography with mammography in patients with palpable breast lesions.
Soo MS; Rosen EL; Baker JA; Vo TT; Boyd BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Nov; 177(5):1167-70. PubMed ID: 11641195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paget's disease of the breast: accuracy of preoperative assessment.
Zakaria S; Pantvaidya G; Ghosh K; Degnim AC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Apr; 102(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 17028984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of palpable breast masses.
Klein S
Am Fam Physician; 2005 May; 71(9):1731-8. PubMed ID: 15887452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses.
Harper AP; Kelly-Fry E; Noe JS; Bies JR; Jackson VP
Radiology; 1983 Mar; 146(3):731-6. PubMed ID: 6298858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
