137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3276063)
1. Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction angiography and conventional arteriography in defining renal anatomy.
Svetkey LP; Dunnick NR; Coffman TM; Himmelstein SI; Bollinger RR; McCann RL; Wilkinson RH; Braun SD; Newman GF; Cohan RH
Transplantation; 1988 Jan; 45(1):56-8. PubMed ID: 3276063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intravenous digital subtraction renal angiography: use in screening for renovascular hypertension.
Dunnick NR; Svetkey LP; Cohan RH; Newman GE; Braun SD; Himmelstein SI; Bollinger RR; McCann RL; Wilkinson RH; Klotman PE
Radiology; 1989 Apr; 171(1):219-22. PubMed ID: 2648471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fibromuscular dysplasia of renal arteries: comparison of intravenous digital subtraction angiography with conventional angiography.
Illescas FF; Braun SD; Cohan RH; Sussman SK; Saeed M; Dunnick NR
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1988 Sep; 39(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 2971048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital subtraction angiography of the renal arteries. Prospective comparison with conventional arteriography.
Clark RA; Alexander ES
Invest Radiol; 1983; 18(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 6339438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital subtraction angiography for renal donor evaluation.
Cho WH; Jacobs SC; Lawson RK
Urology; 1987 Sep; 30(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 3307096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of potential renal donors.
Sussman SK; Weinerth JL; Braun SD; Saeed M; Illescas FF; Cohan RH; Newman GE; Perlmutt LM; Dunnick NR
J Urol; 1987 Jul; 138(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 3298691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of renal intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography].
Hori S; Narumi Y; Marukawa T; Tanaka T; Tokunaga K; Yoshioka H; Kuroda C; Ichikawa S; Ishibashi M; Takaha M
Hinyokika Kiyo; 1985 Aug; 31(8):1329-37. PubMed ID: 3909790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interobserver variability in assessing renal artery stenosis by digital subtraction angiography.
de Vries AR; Engels PH; Overtoom TT; Saltzherr TP; Geyskes BG
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1984; 53(6):277-81. PubMed ID: 6391782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Digital subtraction angiography in potential live-kidney donors: a study of 1000 cases.
Shokeir AA; el-Diasty TA; Nabeeh A; Shaaban AA; el-Kenawy M; Wafa EW; Ghoneim MA
Abdom Imaging; 1994; 19(5):461-5. PubMed ID: 7950829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 100 living-related kidney donor evaluations using digital subtraction angiography.
Flechner SM; Sandler CM; Houston GK; Van Buren CT; Lorber MI; Kahan BD
Transplantation; 1985 Dec; 40(6):675-8. PubMed ID: 3907042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Numerical angiography in the evaluation of arterial hypertension].
Seurot M; Sirinelli D; Colombel B; Ménard J; Corvol P; Gaux JC
J Radiol; 1983; 64(8-9):495-500. PubMed ID: 6358485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Renal vasculature in potential renal transplant donors: comparison of MR imaging and digital subtraction angiography.
Adamis MK; Goldszer RC; Pulde MF; Sax EJ; Edelman RR
Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):467-72. PubMed ID: 7480695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of main renal artery stenosis using phase-contrast cine MR angiography.
Silverman JM; Friedman ML; Van Allan RJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 May; 166(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 8615257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital subtraction angiography in renal transplant recipients.
Irving JD; Khoury GA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1983; 6(4-6):224-30. PubMed ID: 6360360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multidetector CT angiography for preoperative evaluation of living laparoscopic kidney donors.
Kawamoto S; Montgomery RA; Lawler LP; Horton KM; Fishman EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jun; 180(6):1633-8. PubMed ID: 12760934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective analysis of the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of digital subtraction angiography for living-related renal donor evaluation.
McElroy J; Novick AC; Streem SB; Steinmuller D; Risius B; Buszta C; Steinhilber D
Transplantation; 1986 Jul; 42(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3523878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of spiral CT angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of renal transplant donors: a pilot study.
Chu C; Young N; Lau H
Australas Radiol; 2001 May; 45(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 11380353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DIgital intravenous subtraction angiography for investigating renovascular hypertension: comparison with hypertensive urography.
Dunnick NR; Ford KK; Johnson GA; Gunnells JC
South Med J; 1985 Jun; 78(6):690-3. PubMed ID: 3890201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital intravenous subtraction angiography in the evaluation of reconstructed renal arteries.
Saeed M; Braun SD; Illescas FF; Sussman SK; McCann RL; Dunnick NR
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1987; 10(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 3115576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Digital subtraction angiography for noninvasive imaging of the renal artery.
Zabbo A; Novick AC
Urol Clin North Am; 1984 Aug; 11(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 6235658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
