These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32760690)
1. The Role of Experts in the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Limits of Their Epistemic Authority in Democracy. Lavazza A; Farina M Front Public Health; 2020; 8():356. PubMed ID: 32760690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. COVID-19 Science Policy, Experts, and Publics: Why Epistemic Democracy Matters in Ecological Crises. Boschele M OMICS; 2020 Aug; 24(8):479-482. PubMed ID: 32644877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. COVID-19 and Biomedical Experts: When Epistemic Authority is (Probably) Not Enough. Pietrini P; Lavazza A; Farina M J Bioeth Inq; 2022 Mar; 19(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 35038085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons From Italy's and Sweden's Policies in Fighting COVID-19: The Contribution of Biomedical and Social Competences. Farina M; Lavazza A Front Public Health; 2020; 8():563397. PubMed ID: 33072701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Pandemics, Politics and Science: the Role of Science and Scientifics for the Solution of the COVID-19 Pandemic Conflicts]. de Montalvo Jääskeläinen F Cuad Bioet; 2020; 31(102):151-165. PubMed ID: 32910669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The road from evidence to policies and the erosion of the standards of democratic scrutiny in the COVID-19 pandemic. Airoldi G; Vecchi D Hist Philos Life Sci; 2021 Apr; 43(2):66. PubMed ID: 33939023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epistemic communities and experts in health policy-making. Löblová O Eur J Public Health; 2018 Nov; 28(suppl_3):7-10. PubMed ID: 30383255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The COVID-19 pandemic: a case for epistemic pluralism in public health policy. Lohse S; Bschir K Hist Philos Life Sci; 2020 Dec; 42(4):58. PubMed ID: 33315121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protecting the Public's Health in Pandemics: Reflections on Policy Deliberation and the Role of Civil Society in Democracy. Morrissey MBQ; Rivera-Agosto JL Front Public Health; 2021; 9():678210. PubMed ID: 34295870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value conflict between freedom and security: Explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies in democracies and autocracies. Saam NJ; Friedrich C; Engelhardt H PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274270. PubMed ID: 36083998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandatory vaccinations, the segregation of citizens, and the promotion of inequality in the modern democracy of Greece and other democratic countries in the era of COVID-19. Mavridis C; Aidonidis G; Evangelou M; Kalogeridis A Hist Philos Life Sci; 2022 Dec; 44(4):72. PubMed ID: 36477872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Variation Among Public Health Interventions in Initial Efforts to Prevent and Control the Spread of COVID-19 in the 50 States, 29 Big Cities, and the District of Columbia. Fraser MR; Juliano C; Nichols G J Public Health Manag Pract; 2021; 27 Suppl 1, COVID-19 and Public Health: Looking Back, Moving Forward():S29-S38. PubMed ID: 33239561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The European Union and Public Health Emergencies: Expert Opinions on the Management of the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Suggestions for Future Emergencies. Gontariuk M; Krafft T; Rehbock C; Townend D; Van der Auwermeulen L; Pilot E Front Public Health; 2021; 9():698995. PubMed ID: 34490183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The comparative politics of COVID-19: The need to understand government responses. Greer SL; King EJ; da Fonseca EM; Peralta-Santos A Glob Public Health; 2020 Sep; 15(9):1413-1416. PubMed ID: 32564670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Expert committees in German public health policymaking during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a document analysis]. Sell K; Saringer-Hamiti L; Geffert K; Strahwald B; Stratil JM; Pfadenhauer LM Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2021 Oct; 165():1-12. PubMed ID: 34474991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Democracy, Capacity, and Coercion in Pandemic Response: COVID-19 in Comparative Political Perspective. Kavanagh MM; Singh R J Health Polit Policy Law; 2020 Dec; 45(6):997-1012. PubMed ID: 32464665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. COVID-19 Digital Health Innovation Policy: A Portal to Alternative Futures in the Making. Bayram M; Springer S; Garvey CK; Özdemir V OMICS; 2020 Aug; 24(8):460-469. PubMed ID: 32511054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pandemic lockdown, healthcare policies and human rights: integrating opposed views on COVID-19 public health mitigation measures. Burlacu A; Crisan-Dabija R; Covic A; Raiu C; Mavrichi I; Popa IV; Lillo-Crespo M Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2020 Dec; 21(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 33387996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A desire for authoritative science? How citizens' informational needs and epistemic beliefs shaped their views of science, news, and policymaking in the COVID-19 pandemic. Post S; Bienzeisler N; Lohöfener M Public Underst Sci; 2021 Jul; 30(5):496-514. PubMed ID: 33840287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary care perspectives on pandemic politics. Goodyear-Smith F; Kinder K; Eden AR; Strydom S; Bazemore A; Phillips R; Taylor M; George J; Mannie C Glob Public Health; 2021; 16(8-9):1304-1319. PubMed ID: 33491583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]