These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C; Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy. Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial. De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor]. Girault A Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial. Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress. Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study. Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe? Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes and costs between misoprostol and dinoprostone for induction of labor. Nadia Bennett K; Park H; Cioffi J; Calixte R; Vintzileos A J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3732-6. PubMed ID: 26782646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. Chang CH; Chang FM J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term. Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term]. Bagory H; De Broucker C; Tourneux P; Balcaen T; Gondry J; Foulon A; Sergent F Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Mar; 50(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 34871786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Familiari A; Khalil A; Rizzo G; Odibo A; Vergani P; Buca D; Hidaka N; Di Mascio D; Nwabuobi C; Simeone S; Mecacci F; Visentin S; Cosmi E; Liberati M; D'Amico A; Flacco ME; Martellucci CA; Manzoli L; Nappi L; Iacovella C; Bahlmann F; Melchiorre K; Scambia G; Berghella V; D'Antonio F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():455-467. PubMed ID: 32738675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term. Faucett AM; Daniels K; Lee HC; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 34(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 24157494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]