These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32761274)

  • 1. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral misoprostol versus intravaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a comparison study.
    Neri C; Familiari A; Preziosi F; Vassallo C; Botta A; Lanzone A; Carducci B; Caruso A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Aug; 70(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 29376620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction.
    van Gemund N; Scherjon S; LeCessie S; van Leeuwen JH; van Roosmalen J; Kanhai HH
    BJOG; 2004 Jan; 111(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 14687051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low-dose vaginal misoprostol vs vaginal dinoprostone insert for induction of labor beyond 41st week: A randomized trial.
    De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Envid Lázaro BM; Franco Royo MJ; Roca Arquillué M; Campillos Maza JM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Jul; 98(7):913-919. PubMed ID: 30723912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Term Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Methods for Inducing Labor].
    Girault A
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2020 Jan; 48(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 31669528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
    Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe?
    Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes and costs between misoprostol and dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Nadia Bennett K; Park H; Cioffi J; Calixte R; Vintzileos A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3732-6. PubMed ID: 26782646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Chang CH; Chang FM
    J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
    Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol 25μg vs. vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labor at term].
    Bagory H; De Broucker C; Tourneux P; Balcaen T; Gondry J; Foulon A; Sergent F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol; 2022 Mar; 50(3):229-235. PubMed ID: 34871786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse intrapartum outcome in pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age and late fetal growth restriction undergoing induction of labor with Dinoprostone, Misoprostol or mechanical methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Familiari A; Khalil A; Rizzo G; Odibo A; Vergani P; Buca D; Hidaka N; Di Mascio D; Nwabuobi C; Simeone S; Mecacci F; Visentin S; Cosmi E; Liberati M; D'Amico A; Flacco ME; Martellucci CA; Manzoli L; Nappi L; Iacovella C; Bahlmann F; Melchiorre K; Scambia G; Berghella V; D'Antonio F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Sep; 252():455-467. PubMed ID: 32738675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term.
    Faucett AM; Daniels K; Lee HC; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ
    J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 34(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 24157494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.