These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32761274)

  • 21. Randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labor.
    Nunes F; Rodrigues R; Meirinho M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 181(3):626-9. PubMed ID: 10486474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Otigbah CM; Howard RJ; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):629-35. PubMed ID: 11844203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
    Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.
    Harman Crowell EH; Crowell AM; Theiler RN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Aug; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 31455215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
    Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effectiveness of misoprostol or dinoprostone in neonatal outcome after labour induction in post-term nulliparas.
    Soilemetzidis M; Pinidis P; Tsagias N; Ammari A; Liberis A; Liberis V; Galazios G; Tsikouras P
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2015; 42(5):649-52. PubMed ID: 26524816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy and safety of intravaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu A; Lv J; Hu Y; Lang J; Ma L; Chen W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):897-906. PubMed ID: 24698022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
    Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for ripening of unfavorable cervix and labor induction.
    Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Pokpirom J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 1997 Aug; 23(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9311179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short stature and vaginal dinoprostone as independent predictors of composite maternal-newborn adverse outcomes in induction of labor after one previous cesarean: a retrospective cohort study.
    Tan SP; Bashirudin SB; Rajaratnam RK; Gan F
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2024 Jul; 24(1):455. PubMed ID: 38951754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel.
    Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An audit of oral administration of Angusta® (misoprostol) 25 µg for induction of labor in 976 consecutive women with a singleton pregnancy in a university hospital in Denmark.
    Helmig RB; Hvidman LE
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Oct; 99(10):1396-1402. PubMed ID: 32311758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Goffinet F; Durand-Zaleski I; Ville Y; Vayssiere C; Roberto A; Lahna Z; Nisand I; Fisch C; Chaumet-Riffaud P; Chastang C
    BJOG; 2001 Dec; 108(12):1255-62. PubMed ID: 11843388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does Induction with Misoprostol Impact the Small for Gestational Age Neonate?
    Foeller ME; Cruz MO; Kominiarek MA; Hibbard JU
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Dec; 32(14):1311-7. PubMed ID: 26352682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.
    Mayer RB; Oppelt P; Shebl O; Pömer J; Allerstorfer C; Weiss C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():89-93. PubMed ID: 26995147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Agarwal N; Gupta A; Kriplani A; Bhatla N; Parul
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2003 Jun; 29(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 12841697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
    Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.