These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32761274)

  • 41. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Induction of labor with oral misoprostol in nulliparous mothers of twins.
    Simões T; Condeço P; Dias E; Ventura P; Matos C; Blickstein I
    J Perinat Med; 2006; 34(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 16519614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section.
    West HM; Jozwiak M; Dodd JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD009792. PubMed ID: 28599068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mode of delivery in pregnancies with suspected fetal growth restriction following induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin E2.
    Ben-Haroush A; Yogev Y; Glickman H; Kaplan B; Hod M; Bar J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2004 Jan; 83(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 14678086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Oral versus vaginal prostaglandin for labor induction.
    Thorbiörnson A; Vladic T; Stjernholm YV
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Apr; 30(7):789-792. PubMed ID: 27186795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Safe induction of labour with low-dose misoprostol, but less effective than the conventional dinoprostone regimen.
    Petersen JF; Bergholt T; Løkkegaard EC
    Dan Med J; 2013 Sep; 60(9):A4706. PubMed ID: 24001467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for delivery induction among pregnant women without concomitant disease.
    Gornisiewicz T; Kusmierska-Urban K; Huras H; Galas A
    Ginekol Pol; 2020; 91(12):726-732. PubMed ID: 33447991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    McMaster K; Sanchez-Ramos L; Kaunitz AM
    BJOG; 2015 Mar; 122(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24989790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk.
    Handal-Orefice RC; Friedman AM; Chouinard SM; Eke AC; Feinberg B; Politch J; Iverson RE; Yarrington CD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 31188317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review.
    Kundodyiwa TW; Alfirevic Z; Weeks AD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 113(2 Pt 1):374-83. PubMed ID: 19155909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Labor induction with 25-microg misoprostol vaginal capsules.
    Santo S; Lourenço R; Centeno M; Pargana L; Clode N; Ferreira H; da Graça LM
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2009; 68(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 19797903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial.
    Paungmora N; Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Punyavachira P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 15327448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets.
    Eriksson A; Jeppesen S; Krebs L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32033600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mundle WR; Young DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 88(4 Pt 1):521-5. PubMed ID: 8841210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.