These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32762497)

  • 1. Fool me twice: how effective is debriefing in false memory studies?
    Murphy G; Loftus E; Grady RH; Levine LJ; Greene CM
    Memory; 2020 Aug; 28(7):938-949. PubMed ID: 32762497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study.
    Greene CM; Murphy G
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280295. PubMed ID: 36662686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Push polls increase false memories for fake news stories.
    Murphy G; Lynch L; Loftus E; Egan R
    Memory; 2021 Jul; 29(6):693-707. PubMed ID: 34080495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False Memories for Fake News During Ireland's Abortion Referendum.
    Murphy G; Loftus EF; Grady RH; Levine LJ; Greene CM
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Oct; 30(10):1449-1459. PubMed ID: 31432746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Misremembering Brexit: partisan bias and individual predictors of false memories for fake news stories among Brexit voters.
    Greene CM; Nash RA; Murphy G
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):587-604. PubMed ID: 33971789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual differences in susceptibility to false memories for COVID-19 fake news.
    Greene CM; Murphy G
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Dec; 5(1):63. PubMed ID: 33275199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What happens after debriefing? The effectiveness and benefits of postexperimental debriefing.
    Greenspan RL; Loftus EF
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):696-709. PubMed ID: 34374927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Us versus them: The role of national identity in the formation of false memories for fake news.
    Delaney T; Castillo L; Friehs MA; Buttlar B; Greene CM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Mar; 30(1):33-47. PubMed ID: 37902694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decreased susceptibility to false memories from misinformation in hormonal contraception users.
    Petersen N; Patihis L; Nielsen SE
    Memory; 2015; 23(7):1029-38. PubMed ID: 25142128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unringing the bell: Successful debriefing following a rich false memory study.
    Greene CM; Ryan KM; Ballantyne L; Barrett E; Cowman CS; Dawson CA; Huston C; Maher J; Murphy G
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jul; 52(5):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 38286945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Partisan bias in false memories for misinformation about the 2021 U.S. Capitol riot.
    Calvillo DP; Harris JD; Hawkins WC
    Memory; 2023 Jan; 31(1):137-146. PubMed ID: 36170037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding negative events under stress: high subjective arousal is related to accurate emotional memory despite misinformation exposure.
    Hoscheidt SM; LaBar KS; Ryan L; Jacobs WJ; Nadel L
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Jul; 112():237-47. PubMed ID: 24055594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prime time news: the influence of primed positive and negative emotion on susceptibility to false memories.
    Porter S; ten Brinke L; Riley SN; Baker A
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(8):1422-34. PubMed ID: 24552271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of neural activity that leads to true memories, false memories, and forgetting: An fMRI study of the misinformation effect.
    Baym CL; Gonsalves BD
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2010 Sep; 10(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 20805535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False memories for true and false vaccination information form in line with pre-existing vaccine opinions.
    Greene CM; de Saint Laurent C; Hegarty K; Murphy G
    Appl Cogn Psychol; 2022 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 36250192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An exploratory high-density EEG investigation of the misinformation effect: Attentional and recollective differences between true and false perceptual memories.
    Kiat JE; Belli RF
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2017 May; 141():199-208. PubMed ID: 28442391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nevertheless, partisanship persisted: fake news warnings help briefly, but bias returns with time.
    Grady RH; Ditto PH; Loftus EF
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Jul; 6(1):52. PubMed ID: 34297248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.
    Kemp PL; Sinclair AH; Adcock RA; Wahlheim CN
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):28. PubMed ID: 38713308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False memory and COVID-19: How people fall for fake news about COVID-19 in digital contexts.
    Mangiulli I; Battista F; Kafi NA; Coveliers E; Webster TC; Curci A; Otgaar H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():972004. PubMed ID: 36312068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do participants feel about the ethics of rich false memory studies?
    Murphy G; Maher J; Ballantyne L; Barrett E; Cowman CS; Dawson CA; Huston C; Ryan KM; Greene CM
    Memory; 2023 Apr; 31(4):474-481. PubMed ID: 36689341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.