These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32762517)

  • 41. Comparison of voice-use profiles between elementary classroom and music teachers.
    Morrow SL; Connor NP
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 20359861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Changes in voice during a day in normal voices without vocal loading.
    Artkoski M; Tommila J; Laukkanen AM
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2002; 27(3):118-23. PubMed ID: 12498352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The Influence of Multisensory Input On Voice Perception and Production Using Immersive Virtual Reality.
    Daşdöğen Ü; Awan SN; Bottalico P; Iglesias A; Getchell N; Abbott KV
    J Voice; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37739864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Analysis and Classification of Voice Pathologies Using Glottal Signal Parameters.
    Forero M LA; Kohler M; Vellasco MM; Cataldo E
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 26474715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cepstral analysis in patients with a vocal fold motility impairment: advantages of the cepstrum over time-based acoustic analysis.
    Delgado-Vargas B; Acle-Cervera L; Sánz-López L; Bonet-Loscertales M; Pérez-Naranjo N; Fuentes-Navajo P
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 278(1):173-179. PubMed ID: 32839861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
    Eskenazi L; Childers DG; Hicks DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Jun; 33(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 2359270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Individual Monitoring of Vocal Effort With Relative Fundamental Frequency: Relationships With Aerodynamics and Listener Perception.
    Lien YA; Michener CM; Eadie TL; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 58(3):566-75. PubMed ID: 25675090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A Two-Stage Cepstral Analysis Procedure for the Classification of Rough Voices.
    Awan SN; Awan JA
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 30391019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perceptual and Acoustic Analyses of Good Voice Quality in Male Radio Performers.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Ternström S; Yiu E; Heard R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):259.e1-259.e12. PubMed ID: 27342753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Cepstral analysis of normal and pathological voice in Spanish adults. Smoothed cepstral peak prominence in sustained vowels versus connected speech.
    Delgado-Hernández J; León-Gómez NM; Izquierdo-Arteaga LM; Llanos-Fumero Y
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(3):134-140. PubMed ID: 28867553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Improved measurement of vocal penetration].
    Pahn J; Pahn E; Wilke W
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1995; 47(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 7670556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An Examination of Pre- and Posttreatment Acoustic Versus Auditory Perceptual Analyses of Voice Across Four Common Voice Disorders.
    Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J; Lewandowski A; Awan SN
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):169-176. PubMed ID: 28688672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Use of cepstral analysis for differentiating dysphonic from normal voices in children.
    Esen Aydinli F; Özcebe E; İncebay Ö
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jan; 116():107-113. PubMed ID: 30554679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Test-Retest Reliability of Relative Fundamental Frequency and Conventional Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Perceptual Measures in Individuals With Healthy Voices.
    Park Y; Stepp CE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 62(6):1707-1718. PubMed ID: 31181173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
    Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Delivery of Intensive Voice Therapy for Vocal Fold Nodules Via Telepractice: A Pilot Feasibility and Efficacy Study.
    Fu S; Theodoros DG; Ward EC
    J Voice; 2015 Nov; 29(6):696-706. PubMed ID: 25726070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An iOS-based Cepstral Peak Prominence Application: Feasibility for Patient Practice of Resonant Voice.
    van Leer E; Pfister RC; Zhou X
    J Voice; 2017 Jan; 31(1):131.e9-131.e16. PubMed ID: 26846543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Impact of Face Masks on Speech Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Healthcare Professionals.
    McKenna VS; Kendall CL; Patel TH; Howell RJ; Gustin RL
    Laryngoscope; 2022 Feb; 132(2):391-397. PubMed ID: 34287933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The ChatterVox portable voice amplifier: a means to vibration dose reduction?
    McCormick CA; Roy N
    J Voice; 2002 Dec; 16(4):502-8. PubMed ID: 12512638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.