These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32762654)

  • 1. Performances of Adaptive MultiBLUP, Bayesian regressions, and weighted-GBLUP approaches for genomic predictions in Belgian Blue beef cattle.
    Gualdrón Duarte JL; Gori AS; Hubin X; Lourenco D; Charlier C; Misztal I; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2020 Aug; 21(1):545. PubMed ID: 32762654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GWABLUP: genome-wide association assisted best linear unbiased prediction of genetic values.
    Meuwissen T; Eikje LS; Gjuvsland AB
    Genet Sel Evol; 2024 Mar; 56(1):17. PubMed ID: 38429665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving Genomic Predictions in Multi-Breed Cattle Populations: A Comparative Analysis of BayesR and GBLUP Models.
    Ma H; Li H; Ge F; Zhao H; Zhu B; Zhang L; Gao H; Xu L; Li J; Wang Z
    Genes (Basel); 2024 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 38397242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genomic Prediction Using Multi-trait Weighted GBLUP Accounting for Heterogeneous Variances and Covariances Across the Genome.
    Karaman E; Lund MS; Anche MT; Janss L; Su G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Nov; 8(11):3549-3558. PubMed ID: 30194089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using markers with large effect in genetic and genomic predictions.
    Lopes MS; Bovenhuis H; van Son M; Nordbø Ø; Grindflek EH; Knol EF; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 28177367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient weighting methods for genomic best linear-unbiased prediction (BLUP) adapted to the genetic architectures of quantitative traits.
    Ren D; An L; Li B; Qiao L; Liu W
    Heredity (Edinb); 2021 Feb; 126(2):320-334. PubMed ID: 32980863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of whole-genome sequence data and novel genomic selection strategies to improve selection for age at puberty in tropically-adapted beef heifers.
    Warburton CL; Engle BN; Ross EM; Costilla R; Moore SS; Corbet NJ; Allen JM; Laing AR; Fordyce G; Lyons RE; McGowan MR; Burns BM; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 May; 52(1):28. PubMed ID: 32460805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle.
    Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genome-wide association study and prediction of genomic breeding values for fatty-acid composition in Korean Hanwoo cattle using a high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism array.
    Bhuiyan MSA; Kim YK; Kim HJ; Lee DH; Lee SH; Yoon HB; Lee SH
    J Anim Sci; 2018 Sep; 96(10):4063-4075. PubMed ID: 30265318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling heterogeneous (co)variances from adjacent-SNP groups improves genomic prediction for milk protein composition traits.
    Gebreyesus G; Lund MS; Buitenhuis B; Bovenhuis H; Poulsen NA; Janss LG
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Dec; 49(1):89. PubMed ID: 29207947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of genomic predictions in Bos indicus (Nellore) cattle.
    Neves HH; Carvalheiro R; O'Brien AM; Utsunomiya YT; do Carmo AS; Schenkel FS; Sölkner J; McEwan JC; Van Tassell CP; Cole JB; da Silva MV; Queiroz SA; Sonstegard TS; Garcia JF
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Feb; 46(1):17. PubMed ID: 24575732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of causative quantitative trait nucleotides in single-step GBLUP.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Legarra A; Misztal I
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jul; 49(1):59. PubMed ID: 28747171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the accuracy of genomic evaluation for linear body measurement traits using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction in Hanwoo beef cattle.
    Naserkheil M; Lee DH; Mehrban H
    BMC Genet; 2020 Dec; 21(1):144. PubMed ID: 33267771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population.
    Silva RM; Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DA; Magalhães AF; Irano N; Carvalheiro R; Canesin RC; Mercadante ME; Boligon AA; Baldi FS; Misztal I; Albuquerque LG
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Sep; 94(9):3613-3623. PubMed ID: 27898889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Weighted Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction for Carcass Traits in Hanwoo Cattle.
    Lopez BI; Lee SH; Park JE; Shin DH; Oh JD; de Las Heras-Saldana S; van der Werf J; Chai HH; Park W; Lim D
    Genes (Basel); 2019 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 31817753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternative SNP weighting for single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor evaluation of stature in US Holsteins in the presence of selected sequence variants.
    Fragomeni BO; Lourenco DAL; Legarra A; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):10012-10019. PubMed ID: 31495612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.