204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32763326)
1. Comparing the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in tattoo removal: A systematic review.
Gurnani P; Williams N; Al-Hetheli G; Chukwuma O; Roth R; Fajardo F; Nouri K
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2022 Jul; 87(1):103-109. PubMed ID: 32763326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lasers for the treatment of eyebrow microblading and cosmetic tattoo pigment: a review of the literature.
Geisler AN; Eber A; Kim K; Arndt KA
Lasers Med Sci; 2023 Nov; 38(1):256. PubMed ID: 37932517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perfluorodecalin-infused patch in picosecond and Q-switched laser-assisted tattoo removal: Safety in Fitzpatrick IV-VI skin types.
Vangipuram R; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2019 Jan; 51(1):23-26. PubMed ID: 30311666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laser removal of tattoos.
Kuperman-Beade M; Levine VJ; Ashinoff R
Am J Clin Dermatol; 2001; 2(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11702617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laser tattoo removal: laser principles and an updated guide for clinicians.
Hernandez L; Mohsin N; Frech FS; Dreyfuss I; Vander Does A; Nouri K
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Aug; 37(6):2581-2587. PubMed ID: 35604505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Picosecond lasers for tattoo removal: a systematic review.
Reiter O; Atzmony L; Akerman L; Levi A; Kershenovich R; Lapidoth M; Mimouni D
Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Sep; 31(7):1397-405. PubMed ID: 27311768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Neodymium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Nd:YAG) 1064-nm picosecond laser vs. Nd:YAG 1064-nm nanosecond laser in tattoo removal: a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial.
Pinto F; Große-Büning S; Karsai S; Weiß C; Bäumler W; Hammes S; Felcht M; Raulin C
Br J Dermatol; 2017 Feb; 176(2):457-464. PubMed ID: 27518129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Eyebrow Tattoos in Fitzpatrick III-IV With Picosecond (1,064, 532-nm) Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser With a Perfluorodecalin-Infused Patch: A Pilot Study.
Moustafa F; Suggs A; Hamill SS; Friedman PM
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Sep; 52(7):586-589. PubMed ID: 31828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retrospective Review of the Laser Removal of Facial Cosmetic Tattoos.
Hartman N; Loyal J; Borsack S; Goldman MP; Boen M
Dermatol Surg; 2023 Jun; 49(6):559-565. PubMed ID: 36946770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful Treatment of Cosmetic Oral Mucosal Tattoos Using QS 694-nm Ruby Laser and 755-nm Alexandrite Picosecond Laser.
Feng H; Christman MP; Muzumdar S; Geronemus RG
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Oct; 52(8):705-707. PubMed ID: 31885087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. New and Advanced Picosecond Lasers for Tattoo Removal.
Adatto MA; Amir R; Bhawalkar J; Sierra R; Bankowski R; Rozen D; Dierickx C; Lapidoth M
Curr Probl Dermatol; 2017; 52():113-123. PubMed ID: 28288459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combination of Dual Wavelength Picosecond and Nanosecond Pulse Width Neodymium-Doped Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Lasers for Tattoo Removal.
Kato H; Doi K; Kanayama K; Araki J; Nakatsukasa S; Chi D; Mori M; Fuse Y; Sakae Y; Uozumi T
Lasers Surg Med; 2020 Jul; 52(6):515-522. PubMed ID: 31729066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tattoo removal by Q-switched yttrium aluminium garnet laser: client satisfaction.
Hutton Carlsen K; Esmann J; Serup J
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2017 May; 31(5):904-909. PubMed ID: 28107564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of picosecond laser on the multi-colored tattoo removal using Hartley guinea pig: A preliminary study.
Choi MS; Seo HS; Kim JG; Choe SJ; Park BC; Kim MH; Hong SP
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203370. PubMed ID: 30188934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lasers for tattoo removal: a review.
Choudhary S; Elsaie ML; Leiva A; Nouri K
Lasers Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 25(5):619-27. PubMed ID: 20549279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of two picosecond lasers to a nanosecond laser for treating tattoos: a prospective randomized study on 49 patients.
Lorgeou A; Perrillat Y; Gral N; Lagrange S; Lacour JP; Passeron T
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2018 Feb; 32(2):265-270. PubMed ID: 28758261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Outcomes of 1064-nm picosecond laser alone and in combination with fractional 1064-nm picosecond laser in tattoo removal.
Sirithanabadeekul P; Vongchansathapat P; Sutthipisal N; Thanasarnaksorn W; Suwanchinda A
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2022 Jul; 21(7):2832-2839. PubMed ID: 35488471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successful Removal of 17 Tattoos Self-Administered Using Black Eyeliner Ink with Quality-Switched Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet 1,064-nm Laser: A Case Report.
Seyed Jafari SM; Bossart S; Adatto M; Feldmeyer L; Yawalkar N; Heidemeyer K
Case Rep Dermatol; 2024; 16(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 38650914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of picosecond versus nanosecond Nd:YAG lasers for the removal of cosmetic tattoos in an animal model.
Leu FJ; Huang CL; Wu YS; Wang CC
Lasers Med Sci; 2022 Mar; 37(2):1343-1350. PubMed ID: 34410571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A split-tattoo randomized Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser trial comparing the efficacy of a novel three-pass, one-session method with a conventional method in the treatment of blue/black tattoos in darker skin types.
Narayanan A; Bhari N; Sreenivas V; Sharma VK; Sethuraman G
Clin Exp Dermatol; 2022 Jan; 47(1):125-128. PubMed ID: 34236705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
