These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Humeral head size predicts baseplate lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a comparative computer model study. Bauer S; Blakeney WG; Meylan A; Mahlouly J; Wang AW; Walch A; Tolosano L JSES Int; 2024 Mar; 8(2):335-342. PubMed ID: 38464453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Glenosphere design affects range of movement and risk of friction-type scapular impingement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G Bone Joint J; 2018 Sep; 100-B(9):1182-1186. PubMed ID: 30168761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Lateralized glenosphere reverse shoulder arthroplasty: inlay and onlay designs have similar clinical outcomes in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Meshram P; Joseph J; Zhou Y; Srikumaran U; McFarland EG J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Apr; 31(4):747-754. PubMed ID: 34543744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study. Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Posteroinferior relevant scapular neck offset in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: key player for motion and friction-type impingement in a computer model. Bauer S; Blakeney WG; Goyal N; Flayac H; Wang A; Corbaz J J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2638-2646. PubMed ID: 35931331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comprehensive evaluation of the association of radiographic measures of lateralization on clinical outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Erickson BJ; Werner BC; Griffin JW; Gobezie R; Lederman E; Sears BW; Bents E; Denard PJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 May; 31(5):963-970. PubMed ID: 34715281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Eccentricity and greater size of the glenosphere increase impingement-free range of motion in glenoid lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: A computational study. Franceschetti E; Perricone G; De Rosa A; Tanzilli A; Gregori P; Giurazza G; Zampogna B; Shanmugasundaram S; Papalia R J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2024 Sep; 56():102527. PubMed ID: 39309728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study. Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-assisted analysis of functional internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: implications for component choice and orientation. Hochreiter B; Meisterhans M; Zindel C; Calek AK; Gerber C J Exp Orthop; 2023 Mar; 10(1):23. PubMed ID: 36917396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Can we separately measure glenoid vs. humeral lateralization and distalization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? Schippers P; Lacouture JD; Junker M; Baranowski A; Drees P; Gercek E; Boileau P J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 May; 33(5):1169-1176. PubMed ID: 37890767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robert H. Cofield, MD, Award for Best Oral Presentation 2023: Up to 8 mm of glenoid-sided lateralization does not increase the risk of acromial or scapular spine stress fracture following reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° inlay humeral component. Pak T; Ardebol J; Menendez ME; Gobezie R; Sears BW; Lederman E; ; Werner BC; Denard PJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; 33(6S):S1-S8. PubMed ID: 38237722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of humeral stem design on humeral position and range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Terrier A; Ston J; Walch G Int Orthop; 2015 Nov; 39(11):2205-13. PubMed ID: 26381907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference? Freislederer F; Toft F; Audigé L; Marzel A; Endell D; Scheibel M J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):341-351. PubMed ID: 34450279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Implant characteristics affect in vivo shoulder kinematics during multiplanar functional motions after reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Como C; LeVasseur C; Kane G; Rai A; Munsch M; Gabrielli A; Hughes J; Anderst W; Lin A J Biomech; 2022 Apr; 135():111050. PubMed ID: 35313249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility. Freislederer F; Moroder P; Audigé L; Schneller T; Ameziane Y; Trefzer R; Imiolczyk JP; Scheibel M BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Mar; 25(1):204. PubMed ID: 38454432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Does Humeral Component Lateralization in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Affect Rotator Cuff Torque? Evaluation in a Cadaver Model. Chan K; Langohr GDG; Mahaffy M; Johnson JA; Athwal GS Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 475(10):2564-2571. PubMed ID: 28616758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical outcomes related to glenosphere overhang in reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a lateralized humeral design. Dean EW; Dean NE; Wright TW; Hao KA; Schoch BS; Farmer KW; Struk AM; King JJ J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2106-2115. PubMed ID: 35472577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]