These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

48 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32763747)

  • 1. Improving juror assessments of forensic testimony and its effects on decision-making and evidence evaluation.
    LaBat DE; Goldfarb D; Evans JR; Compo NS; Koolmees CJ; LaPorte G; Lothridge K
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Oct; 47(5):566-578. PubMed ID: 37603005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of following best practice reporting recommendations on legal and community evaluations of forensic examiners reports.
    Summersby S; Edmond G; Kemp RI; Ballantyne KN; Martire KA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 Jun; 359():112034. PubMed ID: 38704924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forensic science: A judicial perspective.
    Rakoff JS; Liu G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301838120. PubMed ID: 37782784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3D scanning a crime scene to enhance juror understanding of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis evidence.
    Home PH; Norman DG; Wade K; Spearing E; Williams MA
    Sci Justice; 2024 May; 64(3):333-338. PubMed ID: 38735670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis.
    Eldridge H
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2019; 1():24-34. PubMed ID: 32411951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy and reproducibility of forensic tire examination decisions.
    Richetelli N; LeMay J; Dunagan KM; Parks CL; Hicklin RA; Chapman WJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2024 May; 358():112009. PubMed ID: 38581823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A guide to measuring expert performance in forensic pattern matching.
    Robson SG; Searston RA; Thompson MB; Tangen JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38485882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The scientific reinvention of forensic science.
    Koehler JJ; Mnookin JL; Saks MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Oct; 120(41):e2301840120. PubMed ID: 37782789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global survey on evaluative reporting on DNA evidence with regard to activity-level propositions.
    Prinz M; Pirtle D; Oldoni F
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):798-813. PubMed ID: 38351537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A transparent approach: Openness in forensic science reporting.
    Ballantyne KN; Summersby S; Pearson JR; Nicol K; Pirie E; Quinn C; Kogios R
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2024; 8():100474. PubMed ID: 38737993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interpol review of toxicology 2019-2022.
    Cheng JY; Hui JW; Chan WS; So MH; Hong YH; Leung WT; Ku KW; Yeung HS; Lo KM; Fung KM; Ip CY; Dao KL; Cheung BK
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2023; 6():100303. PubMed ID: 36597440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.
    Quigley-McBride A; Dror IE; Roy T; Garrett BL; Kukucka J
    Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100216. PubMed ID: 35243284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Juror appraisals of forensic evidence: Effects of blind proficiency and cross-examination.
    Crozier WE; Kukucka J; Garrett BL
    Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Oct; 315():110433. PubMed ID: 32763747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Educating Jurors about Forensic Evidence: Using an Expert Witness and Judicial Instructions to Mitigate the Impact of Invalid Forensic Science Testimony.
    Eastwood J; Caldwell J
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Nov; 60(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 26234166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mock jurors' evaluation of firearm examiner testimony.
    Garrett BL; Scurich N; Crozier WE
    Law Hum Behav; 2020 Oct; 44(5):412-423. PubMed ID: 33090867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The forensic expert witness--an issue of competency.
    Hiss J; Freund M; Kahana T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(2-3):89-94. PubMed ID: 16842948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forensic human identification in the United States and Canada: a review of the law, admissible techniques, and the legal implications of their application in forensic cases.
    Holobinko A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Oct; 222(1-3):394.e1-13. PubMed ID: 22738737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.