217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32765242)
1. The Electrocortical Signature of Successful and Unsuccessful Deception in a Face-to-Face Social Interaction.
Wagner-Altendorf TA; van der Lugt AH; Banfield JF; Meyer C; Rohrbach C; Heldmann M; Münte TF
Front Hum Neurosci; 2020; 14():277. PubMed ID: 32765242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of statement type and repetition on deception detection.
Cash DK; Dianiska RE; Lane SM
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Sep; 4(1):38. PubMed ID: 31549260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A truth that's told with bad intent: an ERP study of deception.
Carrión RE; Keenan JP; Sebanz N
Cognition; 2010 Jan; 114(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 19836013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Telling a truth to deceive: Examining executive control and reward-related processes underlying interpersonal deception.
Sai L; Wu H; Hu X; Fu G
Brain Cogn; 2018 Aug; 125():149-156. PubMed ID: 29990705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying deceptive hazard evaluation: An event-related potentials investigation.
Fu H; Qiu W; Ma H; Ma Q
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182892. PubMed ID: 28793344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Attempting to hide our real thoughts: electrophysiological evidence from truthful and deceptive responses during evaluation.
Dong G; Wu H
Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20470861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The self in conflict: the role of executive processes during truthful and deceptive responses about attitudes.
Johnson R; Henkell H; Simon E; Zhu J
Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):469-82. PubMed ID: 17919934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events.
Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can you catch a liar? How negative emotions affect brain responses when lying or telling the truth.
Proverbio AM; Vanutelli ME; Adorni R
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59383. PubMed ID: 23536874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrophysiological markers of working memory usage as an index for truth-based lies.
Lo YH; Tseng P
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 18(6):1089-1104. PubMed ID: 30022430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "You can't kid a kidder": association between production and detection of deception in an interactive deception task.
Wright GR; Berry CJ; Bird G
Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():87. PubMed ID: 22529790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differential effects of practice on the executive processes used for truthful and deceptive responses: an event-related brain potential study.
Johnson R; Barnhardt J; Zhu J
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):386-404. PubMed ID: 16099352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Explicit Instructions Increase Cognitive Costs of Deception in Predictable Social Context.
Falkiewicz M; Sarzyńska J; Babula J; Szatkowska I; Grabowska A; Nęcka E
Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1863. PubMed ID: 26696929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masking the truth: the impact of face masks on deception detection.
Cash DK; Pazos LA
J Soc Psychol; 2023 Mar; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 36987617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Both High Cognitive Load and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Over the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Make Truth and Lie Responses More Similar.
Sánchez N; Masip J; Gómez-Ariza CJ
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():776. PubMed ID: 32508700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting deception in children: A meta-analysis.
Gongola J; Scurich N; Quas JA
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 27685642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. How humans impair automated deception detection performance.
Kleinberg B; Verschuere B
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2021 Feb; 213():103250. PubMed ID: 33450692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI.
Langleben DD; Loughead JW; Bilker WB; Ruparel K; Childress AR; Busch SI; Gur RC
Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Dec; 26(4):262-72. PubMed ID: 16161128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deceptive Intentions: Can Cues to Deception Be Measured before a Lie Is Even Stated?
Ströfer S; Noordzij ML; Ufkes EG; Giebels E
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125237. PubMed ID: 26018573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A true denial or a false confession? Assessing veracity of suspects' statements using MASAM and SVA.
Wojciechowski BW; Gräns M; Lidén M
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198211. PubMed ID: 29856813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
