These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

407 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32765837)

  • 1. The science of safety: complications associated with the use of mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock and best practices to maximize safety.
    Kapur NK; Whitehead EH; Thayer KL; Pahuja M
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():. PubMed ID: 32765837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefit of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with Impella (ECpella) therapy in acute coronary syndrome with cardiogenic shock.
    Shibasaki I; Masawa T; Abe S; Ogawa H; Takei Y; Tezuka M; Seki M; Kato T; Watanabe R; Koshiji N; Saitou S; Ogata K; Haruyama Y; Toyoda S; Fukuda H
    J Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 80(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 35288000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical Circulatory Support: a Comprehensive Review With a Focus on Women.
    Alasnag M; Truesdell AG; Williams H; Martinez SC; Qadri SK; Skendelas JP; Jakobleff WA; Alasnag M
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2020 Apr; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 32328843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mortality in cardiogenic shock patients receiving mechanical circulatory support: a network meta-analysis.
    Zhang Q; Han Y; Sun S; Zhang C; Liu H; Wang B; Wei S
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35152887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcomes of mechanical circulatory support-related complications in patients with cardiogenic shock.
    Takahashi K; Kubo S; Ikuta A; Osakada K; Takamatsu M; Taguchi Y; Ohya M; Shimada T; Miura K; Tada T; Tanaka H; Fuku Y; Kadota K
    J Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 79(2):163-169. PubMed ID: 34511239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trends in mechanical circulatory support use and hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-infarction related cardiogenic shock in the United States.
    Shah M; Patnaik S; Patel B; Ram P; Garg L; Agarwal M; Agrawal S; Arora S; Patel N; Wald J; Jorde UP
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2018 Apr; 107(4):287-303. PubMed ID: 29134345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advanced Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Miller PE; Solomon MA; McAreavey D
    Crit Care Med; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1922-1929. PubMed ID: 28857849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impella Support for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Schrage B; Ibrahim K; Loehn T; Werner N; Sinning JM; Pappalardo F; Pieri M; Skurk C; Lauten A; Landmesser U; Westenfeld R; Horn P; Pauschinger M; Eckner D; Twerenbold R; Nordbeck P; Salinger T; Abel P; Empen K; Busch MC; Felix SB; Sieweke JT; Møller JE; Pareek N; Hill J; MacCarthy P; Bergmann MW; Henriques JPS; Möbius-Winkler S; Schulze PC; Ouarrak T; Zeymer U; Schneider S; Blankenberg S; Thiele H; Schäfer A; Westermann D
    Circulation; 2019 Mar; 139(10):1249-1258. PubMed ID: 30586755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Glycemic patterns and impact of early hyperglycaemia in patients with cardiogenic shock on mechanical circulatory support.
    Nair RM; Chawla S; Mentias A; Saleem T; Vural A; Ko T; Rampersad P; Cremer P; Menon V
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2023 May; 12(5):328-335. PubMed ID: 37010099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Use of Mechanical Circulatory Assist Devices for ACS Patients with Cardiogenic Shock and High-Risk PCI.
    Manian N; Thakker J; Nair A
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2022 Jun; 24(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 35403950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acute Mechanical Circulatory Support for Cardiogenic Shock.
    Telukuntla KS; Estep JD
    Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J; 2020; 16(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 32280415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Practice Patterns in Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Shock in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) Registry.
    Berg DD; Barnett CF; Kenigsberg BB; Papolos A; Alviar CL; Baird-Zars VM; Barsness GW; Bohula EA; Brennan J; Burke JA; Carnicelli AP; Chaudhry SP; Cremer PC; Daniels LB; DeFilippis AP; Gerber DA; Granger CB; Hollenberg S; Horowitz JM; Gladden JD; Katz JN; Keeley EC; Keller N; Kontos MC; Lawler PR; Menon V; Metkus TS; Miller PE; Nativi-Nicolau J; Newby LK; Park JG; Phreaner N; Roswell RO; Schulman SP; Sinha SS; Snell RJ; Solomon MA; Teuteberg JJ; Tymchak W; van Diepen S; Morrow DA
    Circ Heart Fail; 2019 Nov; 12(11):e006635. PubMed ID: 31707801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Concomitant Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Use in Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
    Vallabhajosyula S; O'Horo JC; Antharam P; Ananthaneni S; Vallabhajosyula S; Stulak JM; Eleid MF; Dunlay SM; Gersh BJ; Rihal CS; Barsness GW
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006930. PubMed ID: 30354593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.
    Schwartz B; Jain P; Salama M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Feb; 19(2):151-164. PubMed ID: 33356662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A; Khan MS; Saad M; Siddiqui S; Eltahawy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella® LP5.0 pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump for cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction: The IMPELLA-STIC randomized study.
    Bochaton T; Huot L; Elbaz M; Delmas C; Aissaoui N; Farhat F; Mewton N; Bonnefoy E;
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2020 Apr; 113(4):237-243. PubMed ID: 31740272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.
    Pahuja M; Hernandez-Montfort J; Whitehead EH; Kawabori M; Kapur NK
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2022 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 34894975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.
    Basir MB; Schreiber T; Dixon S; Alaswad K; Patel K; Almany S; Khandelwal A; Hanson I; George A; Ashbrook M; Blank N; Abdelsalam M; Sareen N; Timmis SBH; O'Neill Md WW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Feb; 91(3):454-461. PubMed ID: 29266676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intra-aortic balloon pump impacts the regional haemodynamics of patients with cardiogenic shock treated with femoro-femoral veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
    Xu B; Li C; Cai T; Cui Y; Du Z; Fan Q; Guo D; Jiang C; Xing Z; Xin M; Wang P; Wang L; Yang F; Jia M; Wang H; Hou X
    ESC Heart Fail; 2022 Aug; 9(4):2610-2617. PubMed ID: 35644478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.