These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32767744)

  • 61. Use of targeted array-based CGH for the clinical diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance: is less more?
    Bejjani BA; Saleki R; Ballif BC; Rorem EA; Sundin K; Theisen A; Kashork CD; Shaffer LG
    Am J Med Genet A; 2005 Apr; 134(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 15723295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Prenatal genetic study of fetuses with congenital heart diseases].
    Xu ZF; Cao L; Ji XQ; Yang C; Zhang JJ; Xu QJ; Zha W; Yang YQ; Lin YS; Chen CH; Liu A; Li L; Lin Y; Yi L
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Apr; 26(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 19350500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. [Application of different technologies for distinguishing true and pseudo mosaicisms during prenatal diagnosis].
    Zhu R; Zhu X; Yang Y; Duan H; Zhang Y; Wu X; Wang W; Li J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Oct; 31(5):636-40. PubMed ID: 25297599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Application of the prenatal BACs-on-Beads™ assay for rapid prenatal detection of sex chromosome mosaicism.
    Zhang M; Chen L; Chen M; Wang Y; Liang B; Lin N; Wu X; Wang L; Xu L; Huang H
    Mol Genet Genomics; 2022 Sep; 297(5):1423-1438. PubMed ID: 35902388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature.
    Breman A; Pursley AN; Hixson P; Bi W; Ward P; Bacino CA; Shaw C; Lupski JR; Beaudet A; Patel A; Cheung SW; Van den Veyver I
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61. PubMed ID: 22467166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Rapid diagnosis of pseudomosaicism in a case of Level II mosaicism for trisomy 5 in a single colony from an in situ culture of amniocytes and a review of mosaic trisomy 5 at amniocentesis.
    Chen CP; Chang SJ; Chern SR; Wu PS; Chen YN; Chen SW; Yang CW; Pan CW; Wang W
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 55(4):602-3. PubMed ID: 27590391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. BACs-on-Beads™ assay for a case of trisomy 22 confined placental mosaicism.
    Zhong G; He H; Zhong Z; Chen J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jul; 41(5):826-827. PubMed ID: 32799711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. [Application of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis for Chromosomal Abnormalities of Spontaneously Aborted Fetuses].
    Hu T; Zhu HM; Zhang Z; Wang JM; Zhang HX; Du Z; Li LP; Wang H; Liu SL
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Sep; 48(5):732-735. PubMed ID: 29130666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Detection of chromosomal abnormalities using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH).
    Jobanputra V; Kriplani A; Choudhry VP; Kucheria K
    Natl Med J India; 1998; 11(6):259-63. PubMed ID: 10083791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. [Combined G-banded karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for the detection of chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with congenital heart defects].
    Liu Y; Xie J; Geng Q; Xu Z; Wu W; Luo F; Li S; Wang Q; Chen W; Tan H; Zhang H
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 34(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 28186583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Prenatally diagnosed de novo segmental amplification or deletion by microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization: A retrospective study.
    Peng HH; Lee CH; Su SY; Chen KJ; Lee YC; You SH; Lee WF; Cheng PJ
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 58(5):662-666. PubMed ID: 31542089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Same-day prenatal diagnosis of common chromosomal aneuploidies using microfluidics-fluorescence in situ hybridization.
    Ho SS; Chua C; Gole L; Biswas A; Koay E; Choolani M
    Prenat Diagn; 2012 Apr; 32(4):321-8. PubMed ID: 22467162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Prenatal Diagnostic Testing.
    Sahajpal NS; Mondal AK; Fee T; Hilton B; Layman L; Hastie AR; Chaubey A; DuPont BR; Kolhe R
    J Mol Diagn; 2023 Apr; 25(4):234-246. PubMed ID: 36758723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. BACs-on-Beads technology: a reliable test for rapid detection of aneuploidies and microdeletions in prenatal diagnosis.
    García-Herrero S; Campos-Galindo I; Martínez-Conejero JA; Serra V; Olmo I; Lara C; Simón C; Rubio C
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():590298. PubMed ID: 24795887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Evaluation of >3,000 cases.
    Eiben B; Trawicki W; Hammans W; Goebel R; Pruggmayer M; Epplen JT
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 1999; 14(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 10420039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Combined chromosomal microarray analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of two cases with Pallister-Killian syndrome].
    Wang T; Ren C; Guo L; Lu J; Chen H; Huang H
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 36(6):571-573. PubMed ID: 31055807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Use of prenatal chromosomal microarray: prospective cohort study and systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Hillman SC; McMullan DJ; Hall G; Togneri FS; James N; Maher EJ; Meller CH; Williams D; Wapner RJ; Maher ER; Kilby MD
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):610-20. PubMed ID: 23512800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Chromosome microarrays in human reproduction.
    Rajcan-Separovic E
    Hum Reprod Update; 2012; 18(5):555-67. PubMed ID: 22661549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. [Clinical significance of secondary results from non-invasive prenatal testing].
    Ke W; Zhao W; Jie S; Chen Q; Li Q
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 34(3):327-331. PubMed ID: 28604948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparative analysis of the application with the combination of CMA and karyotype in routine and late amniocentesis.
    Zheng Y; Zhong Z; Zhao Y; Zhang J; Yang L; Zhao J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2024 Sep; 310(3):1555-1562. PubMed ID: 38955819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.