180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32768100)
1. The insanity defence without mental illness? Some considerations.
Malatesti L; Jurjako M; Meynen G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 71():101571. PubMed ID: 32768100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Mental state and the criminal responsibility--legal regulations and medical criteria in Poland and other countries].
Bolechała F
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 20860304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Who needs capacity?
Buchanan A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 40():1-5. PubMed ID: 25939285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voluntariness, intention, and the defence of mental disorder: toward a rational approach.
McSherry B
Behav Sci Law; 2003; 21(5):581-99. PubMed ID: 14502690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Criminal madness: cultural iconography and insanity.
Covey RD
Stanford Law Rev; 2009 Apr; 61(6):1375-428. PubMed ID: 19489183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reforming automatism and insanity: Neuroscience and claims of lack of capacity for control.
Claydon L
Med Sci Law; 2015 Jul; 55(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 26378107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The reformulated defence of insanity in the Australian Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth).
McSherry B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1997; 20(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 9178061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
Cobun LS
Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Too stubborn to ever be governed by enforced insanity": Some therapeutic jurisprudence dilemmas in the representation of criminal defendants in incompetency and insanity cases.
Perlin ML
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2010; 33(5-6):475-81. PubMed ID: 20947166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Without thinking: impulsive aggression and criminal responsibility.
Shuman DW; Gold LH
Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(6):723-34. PubMed ID: 19039791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forensic psychiatric expert witnessing within the criminal justice system in Germany.
Konrad N; Völlm B
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Translating clinical findings to the legal norm: the Defendant's Insanity Assessment Support Scale (DIASS).
Parmigiani G; Mandarelli G; Meynen G; Carabellese F; Ferracuti S
Transl Psychiatry; 2019 Nov; 9(1):278. PubMed ID: 31699969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mental Condition Requirement in Competency to Stand Trial Assessments.
Reisner AD; Piel JL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2018 Mar; 46(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 29618540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diminished capacity and insanity in Washington State: the battle shifts to admissibility.
Leong GB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 10774845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of legal reforms on length of forensic assessments in Alberta, Canada.
Stuart H; Arboleda-Flórez J; Crisanti AS
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2001; 24(4-5):527-38. PubMed ID: 11521424
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Madness on trial.
Cornwall J
New Sci; 2003 Mar; 177(2386):27. PubMed ID: 14587492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Causality in criminal forensic and in civil disability cases: Legal and psychological comparison.
Young G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():114-20. PubMed ID: 26325348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Personality disorders and criminal responsibility: a second opinion.
Rudnick A; Levy A
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(4):409-20. PubMed ID: 7890474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The medical model of mental illness. Its application to the insanity defense.
Gerard JB
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999; 22(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 10086292
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The normative concept of guilt in criminal law between freedom of will and neurobiological determinism].
Czerner F
Arch Kriminol; 2006; 218(5-6):129-57. PubMed ID: 17217181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
