These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32768107)
1. Forensic assessment may be based on common sense assumptions rather than science. Areh I Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 71():101607. PubMed ID: 32768107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethical issues in personality assessment in forensic psychology. Knapp S; VandeCreek L J Pers Assess; 2001 Oct; 77(2):242-54. PubMed ID: 11693856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should human figure drawings be admitted into court? Lally SJ J Pers Assess; 2001 Feb; 76(1):135-49. PubMed ID: 11206294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Communicating forensic scientific expertise: An analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts. Reid CA; Howes LM Sci Justice; 2020 Mar; 60(2):108-119. PubMed ID: 32111283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The forensic expert witness--an issue of competency. Hiss J; Freund M; Kahana T Forensic Sci Int; 2007 May; 168(2-3):89-94. PubMed ID: 16842948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation. Martelli MF; Zasler ND; Johnson-Greene D Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge. Klee CH; Friedman HJ NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Estimation of incapacity to work in medico-legal opinions given by clinicians and forensic medicine specialists from the Department of Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice--comparative analysis]. Chowaniec C; Jabłoński C; Kobek M; Chowaniec M Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2005; 55(4):261-3. PubMed ID: 16498964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A proactive, data-based determination of the standard of medical care in pediatrics. Meadow W; Lantos J Pediatrics; 1998 Apr; 101(4):E6. PubMed ID: 9741980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Standardization of research in the field of forensic genetics - the current state in the world and introduction to the guidelines in Poland with reference to the work of the Expert Team for Standards and Assessment in Forensic Genetics of the Polish Speaking Working Group of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG-PL). Jacewicz R Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2018; 68(4):215-231. PubMed ID: 31025840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The ethics of health care professionals' opinions for hire. Masella RS; Meister M J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Mar; 132(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 11258093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Differences in psychiatric expertise of responsibility: Assessment and initial hypotheses through a review of literature]. Guivarch J; Piercecchi-Marti MD; Glezer D; Chabannes JM Encephale; 2015 Jun; 41(3):244-50. PubMed ID: 25864036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardizing the psychological autopsy: addressing the Daubert standard. Snider JE; Hane S; Berman AL Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2006 Oct; 36(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 17087630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The power of presentation: How attire, cosmetics, and posture impact the source credibility of women expert witnesses. Jones ACT; Repke A; Batastini AB; Sacco D; Dahlen ER; Mohn RS J Forensic Sci; 2023 May; 68(3):962-971. PubMed ID: 37016533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Decision of German Supreme Court on July 30, 1999 relating to scientific evidence requirements for psychological expert opinion with respect to credibility of testimony and its consequences for future expert consultation]. Balloff R Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2000 Apr; 49(4):261-74. PubMed ID: 10850124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho. Zlotnick J; Lin JR Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [The role of the Medical Scientific Council's Forensic Committee in the consent judgments regarding private insurance companies]. Horváth J Orv Hetil; 2008 Aug; 149(31):1457-62. PubMed ID: 18632506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are forensic experts biased by the side that retained them? Murrie DC; Boccaccini MT; Guarnera LA; Rufino KA Psychol Sci; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1889-97. PubMed ID: 23969777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]