These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32769320)
1. Peer review: A critical step in the editorial process. Agrawal R Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(3):347-349. PubMed ID: 32769320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ninth international congress on peer review and scientific publication: call for research. Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5475. PubMed ID: 31527134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Open review and the quest for increased transparency in neuroscience publication. Foxe JJ; Bolam P Eur J Neurosci; 2017 May; 45(9):1125-1126. PubMed ID: 28186675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review: does it work? Nahai F Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 20442084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Demystifying the Peer-Review Process for HERD. Stichler JF HERD; 2017 Apr; 10(3):7-11. PubMed ID: 28335631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Why we need a golden rule for peer review. Tuckett AG; Kangasniemi M Nurs Ethics; 2017 Dec; 24(8):875-877. PubMed ID: 29224549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Editorial: premature publishing and over-fragmentation. Tarzia G ChemMedChem; 2013 Jan; 8(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 23281336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Role of the Peer Reviewer. Jacobson RM; Fairbrother G; Sheldrick RC; Szilagyi PG Acad Pediatr; 2017 Mar; 17(2):105-106. PubMed ID: 28259333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Scientific method questioned. Paustenbach DJ Int J Occup Environ Health; 2006; 12(3):290-2; author reply 292-3. PubMed ID: 16967840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new approach to peer review or scholarly publishing. J Food Sci; 2023 Mar; 88(3):880-881. PubMed ID: 36892575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Peer review conflicts of interest surface at CIHR. Webster PC CMAJ; 2015 Mar; 187(5):313. PubMed ID: 25691785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. QnAs with Subra Suresh. Interview by Prashant Nair. Suresh S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Oct; 109(40):15969. PubMed ID: 22984183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Overcoming Barriers to Effective Peer Review. Pfeifer CM J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Jun; 16(6):886-888. PubMed ID: 30738768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. From Outcome to Process Focus: Fostering a More Robust Psychological Science Through Registered Reports and Results-Blind Reviewing. Grand JA; Rogelberg SG; Banks GC; Landis RS; Tonidandel S Perspect Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 13(4):448-456. PubMed ID: 29961411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Editorial peer review in US medical journals. Weller AC JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1344-7. PubMed ID: 2406471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses. Christenbery TL J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2011 Jan; 23(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 21208330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]