195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32770113)
1. An ambient temperature collection and stabilization strategy for canine microbiota studies.
Lin CY; Cross TL; Doukhanine E; Swanson KS
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13383. PubMed ID: 32770113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standard Sample Storage Conditions Have an Impact on Inferred Microbiome Composition and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns.
Poulsen CS; Kaas RS; Aarestrup FM; Pamp SJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0138721. PubMed ID: 34612701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the impact of different fecal storage protocols on the microbiota diversity and composition: a pilot study.
Moossavi S; Engen PA; Ghanbari R; Green SJ; Naqib A; Bishehsari F; Merat S; Poustchi H; Keshavarzian A; Malekzadeh R
BMC Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 31253096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles.
Jenkins SV; Vang KB; Gies A; Griffin RJ; Jun SR; Nookaew I; Dings RPM
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):227. PubMed ID: 30591021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Collection of non-meconium stool on fecal occult blood cards is an effective method for fecal microbiota studies in infants.
Wong WSW; Clemency N; Klein E; Provenzano M; Iyer R; Niederhuber JE; Hourigan SK
Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):114. PubMed ID: 28870234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Methods To Collect Fecal Samples for Microbiome Studies Using Whole-Genome Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing.
Byrd DA; Sinha R; Hoffman KL; Chen J; Hua X; Shi J; Chia N; Petrosino J; Vogtmann E
mSphere; 2020 Feb; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 32250964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term stability of microbiome diversity and composition in fecal samples stored in eNAT medium.
Young RR; Jenkins K; Araujo-Perez F; Seed PC; Kelly MS
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Jul; 9(7):e1046. PubMed ID: 32390344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of fecal sample preservation and handling techniques on the canine fecal microbiota profile.
Chiu O; Gomez DE; Obrego D; Dunfield K; MacNicol JL; Liversidge B; Verbrugghe A
PLoS One; 2024; 19(1):e0292731. PubMed ID: 38285680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How should we store avian faecal samples for microbiota analyses? Comparing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Vargas-Pellicer P; Watrobska C; Knowles S; Schroeder J; Banks-Leite C
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Oct; 165():105689. PubMed ID: 31425715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of stool versus rectal swab samples and storage conditions on bacterial community profiles.
Bassis CM; Moore NM; Lolans K; Seekatz AM; Weinstein RA; Young VB; Hayden MK;
BMC Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):78. PubMed ID: 28359329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of short-term room temperature storage on the microbial community in infant fecal samples.
Guo Y; Li SH; Kuang YS; He JR; Lu JH; Luo BJ; Jiang FJ; Liu YZ; Papasian CJ; Xia HM; Deng HW; Qiu X
Sci Rep; 2016 May; 6():26648. PubMed ID: 27226242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of the long-term storage of human fecal microbiota samples collected in RNAlater.
Tap J; Cools-Portier S; Pavan S; Druesne A; Öhman L; Törnblom H; Simren M; Derrien M
Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):601. PubMed ID: 30679604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of method for faecal sampling in cats and dogs for faecal microbiome analysis.
Langon X
BMC Vet Res; 2023 Dec; 19(1):274. PubMed ID: 38102642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes.
Mordant A; Kleiner M
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0187721. PubMed ID: 34908431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
