These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32771129)

  • 1. The psychology of sustainable consumption.
    Kotahwala K
    Prog Brain Res; 2020; 253():283-308. PubMed ID: 32771129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumer Perception of Sustainability Attributes in Organic and Local Food.
    Annunziata A; Mariani A
    Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric; 2018; 9(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 29299996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corporate Sustainable Development Strategy: Effect of Green Shared Vision on Organization Members' Behavior.
    Chang TW
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(7):. PubMed ID: 32260238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why Do Consumers Make Green Purchase Decisions? Insights from a Systematic Review.
    Zhang X; Dong F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(18):. PubMed ID: 32932797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining the meaning of "sustainable work" from activity-centered ergonomics and psychodynamics of Work's perspectives.
    Brunoro CM; Bolis I; Sigahi TFAC; Kawasaki BC; Sznelwar LI
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Nov; 89():103209. PubMed ID: 32658773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The global environmental injustice of fast fashion.
    Bick R; Halsey E; Ekenga CC
    Environ Health; 2018 Dec; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 30591057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of product selection criteria on clothing purchase and post-purchase behaviours: A gender and generational comparison.
    Barrera-Verdugo G; Villarroel-Villarroel A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0267783. PubMed ID: 35731724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Differences across Future Teachers Regarding Attitudes on Social Responsibility for Sustainable Development.
    Estrada-Vidal LI; Olmos-Gómez MDC; López-Cordero R; Ruiz-Garzón F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(15):. PubMed ID: 32722031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Social Media Marketing on Consumer Engagement in Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Bryła P; Chatterjee S; Ciabiada-Bryła B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Corporate Social Responsibility programs of Big Food in Australia: a content analysis of industry documents.
    Richards Z; Thomas SL; Randle M; Pettigrew S
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2015 Dec; 39(6):550-6. PubMed ID: 26259972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Invited review: Sustainability: Different perspectives, inherent conflict.
    Schiano AN; Drake MA
    J Dairy Sci; 2021 Nov; 104(11):11386-11400. PubMed ID: 34454747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring the Roles of Green Food Consumption and Social Trust in the Relationship between Perceived Consumer Effectiveness and Psychological Wellbeing.
    Wang J; Nguyen N; Bu X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jun; 17(13):. PubMed ID: 32610596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Anti-consumption research: A foundational and contemporary overview.
    Lee MS
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2022 Jun; 45():101319. PubMed ID: 35325808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Customer Behavior on Purchasing Channels of Sustainable Customized Garment With Perceived Value and Product Involvement.
    Li Z; Yuan J; Du B; Hu J; Yuan W; Palladini L; Yu B; Zhou Y
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():588512. PubMed ID: 33408664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A systematic review of factors that influence food store owner and manager decision making and ability or willingness to use choice architecture and marketing mix strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases in the United States, 2005-2017.
    Houghtaling B; Serrano EL; Kraak VI; Harden SM; Davis GC; Misyak SA
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2019 Jan; 16(1):5. PubMed ID: 30642352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rural independent and corporate Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)-authorized store owners' and managers' perceived feasibility to implement marketing-mix and choice-architecture strategies to encourage healthy consumer purchases.
    Houghtaling B; Serrano E; Dobson L; Chen S; Kraak VI; Harden SM; Davis GC; Misyak S
    Transl Behav Med; 2019 Oct; 9(5):888-898. PubMed ID: 31570926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining consumers' intentions towards purchasing green food in Qingdao, China: The amendment and extension of the theory of planned behavior.
    Qi X; Ploeger A
    Appetite; 2019 Feb; 133():414-422. PubMed ID: 30537527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overview of green business practices within the Bangladeshi RMG industry: competitiveness and sustainable development perspective.
    Sarkar A; Qian L; Peau AK
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Jun; 27(18):22888-22901. PubMed ID: 32329005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative analysis of sustainability measures in the apparel industry: An empirical consumer and market study in Germany.
    Friedrich D
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 289():112536. PubMed ID: 33845266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Nature and Quality of Australian Supermarkets' Policies that can Impact Public Health Nutrition, and Evidence of their Practical Application: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Pulker CE; Trapp GSA; Scott JA; Pollard CM
    Nutrients; 2019 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 30991733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.