177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32771433)
1. Use of nasal mucosa graft in tympanoplasty.
Coelho SB; Lopes WDS; Bezerra GAM; Araújo DF; Meira ASF; Caldas Neto SDS
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2022; 88(3):345-350. PubMed ID: 32771433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Type 1 tympanoplasty in pediatric patients: Comparison of fascia and perichondrium grafts.
Çayir S; Kayabaşi S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Jun; 121():95-98. PubMed ID: 30878559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of temporalis fascia muscle and full-thickness cartilage grafts in type 1 pediatric tympanoplasties.
Yegin Y; Çelik M; Koç AK; Küfeciler L; Elbistanlı MS; Kayhan FT
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2016; 82(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 27068884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cartilage rim augmented fascia tympanoplasty: a more effective composite graft model than temporalis fascia tympanoplasty.
Kolethekkat AA; Al Abri R; Al Zaabi K; Al Marhoobi N; Jose S; Pillai S; Mathew J
J Laryngol Otol; 2018 Jun; 132(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 29888699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anatomical and Functional Results of Medial and Lateral Surface of Temporal Muscle Fascia in Type 1 Tympanoplasties.
Salcan İ
Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 May; 100(4):237-240. PubMed ID: 32579383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of temporalis fascia and tragal cartilage grafts in type 1 tympanoplasty in elderly patients.
Guler I; Baklaci D; Kuzucu I; Kum RO; Ozcan M
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2019 Jun; 46(3):319-323. PubMed ID: 30224101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Hearing Result and Graft Uptake Rate between Temporalis Fascia and Tragal Cartilage in Endoscopic Myringoplasty.
Shrestha BL; Shakya S; Pradhan A; Dhakal A; Kc AK; Shrestha KS; Pokharel M
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ); 2022; 20(79):359-365. PubMed ID: 37042380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between clinical and audiological results of tympanoplasty with double layer graft (modified sandwich fascia) technique and single layer graft (underlay fascia and underlay cartilage) technique.
Nemade SV; Shinde KJ; Sampate PB
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Jun; 45(3):440-446. PubMed ID: 28855058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Island cartilage vs temporalis fascia in type 1 tympanoplasty: A prospective study.
Jain A; Samdani S; Sharma MP; Meena V
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 69(6):311-317. PubMed ID: 29576202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparison of Cartilage Palisades and Temporal Fascia in Type 1 Tympanoplasty for Bilateral Tympanic Membrane Perforations in Children.
Gün T; Boztepe OF; Atan D; İkincioğulları A; Dere H
J Int Adv Otol; 2017 Apr; 13(1):36-39. PubMed ID: 27879224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cartilage island versus temporalis fascia in high-risk tympanic perforation].
Durán-Padilla CL; Martínez-Chávez J; Amador-Licona N; Pereyra-Nobara TA
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2017; 55 Suppl 1():S58-S63. PubMed ID: 28212476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic cartilage versus temporalis fascia grafting for anterior quadrant tympanic perforations - A prospective study in a tertiary care hospital.
Mohanty S; Manimaran V; Umamaheswaran P; Jeyabalakrishnan S; Chelladurai S
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Oct; 45(5):936-942. PubMed ID: 29397250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Audiological and graft take results of cartilage reinforcement tympanoplasty (a new technique) versus fascia.
Tek A; Karaman M; Uslu C; Habeşoğlu T; Kılıçarslan Y; Durmuş R; Esen S; Egeli E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Apr; 269(4):1117-26. PubMed ID: 21968630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of endoscopic transcanal type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty.
Özdemir D; Özgür A; Akgül G; Çelebi M; Mehel DM; Yemiş T
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Dec; 276(12):3295-3299. PubMed ID: 31520162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Type 1 tympanoplasty in patients with large perforations: Comparison of temporalis fascia, partial-thickness cartilage, and full-thickness cartilage.
Xing C; Liu H; Li G; Li J; Li X
J Int Med Res; 2020 Aug; 48(8):300060520945140. PubMed ID: 32790512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two myringoplasty techniques in Nepalese children: a prospective randomized trial.
Tripathi P; Guragain RP; Bhusal CL; Karna SL; Borgstein J
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1556-60. PubMed ID: 26231742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Palisade cartilage tympanoplasty for management of subtotal perforations: a comparison with the temporalis fascia technique.
Kazikdas KC; Onal K; Boyraz I; Karabulut E
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 264(9):985-9. PubMed ID: 17401572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The wheel-shaped composite cartilage graft (WsCCG) and temporalis fascia for type 1 tympanoplasty: a prospective, randomized study.
Ciğer E; Balcı MK; İşlek A; Önal K
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 275(12):2975-2981. PubMed ID: 30317384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The button graft technique for perforations affecting less than 25% of the tympanic membrane: a non-randomised comparison of a new modification to cartilage tympanoplasty with underlay and overlay grafts.
Abdelghany AM
Clin Otolaryngol; 2013 Jun; 38(3):208-16. PubMed ID: 23745532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the anatomical and functional success of fascia and perichondrium grafts in transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.
Özdamar K; Sen A
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Nov; 48(1):67. PubMed ID: 31771648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
