269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32771605)
1. A cohort comparison of humeral implant designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: does implant design lead to lower rates of complications and revision?
Gorman RA; Christmas KN; Simon P; Mighell MA; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):850-857. PubMed ID: 32771605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; DeVito P; Tahal DS; Mijc D; Ameri B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Sep; 477(9):2097-2108. PubMed ID: 31107323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?
Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cemented versus uncemented reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fractures.
Rossi LA; Guillermina BM; Buljubasich M; Atala N; Tanoira I; Bongiovanni S; Ranalletta M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):261-268. PubMed ID: 34358669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.
Mazaleyrat M; Favard L; Garaud P; Boileau P; Berhouet J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Jan; 30(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 32838951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic evaluation of short-stem press-fit total shoulder arthroplasty: short-term follow-up.
Casagrande DJ; Parks DL; Torngren T; Schrumpf MA; Harmsen SM; Norris TR; Kelly JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jul; 25(7):1163-9. PubMed ID: 26897311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of cemented versus press-fit primary humeral stem fixation in the setting of revision shoulder arthroplasty.
Salesky MA; Grace TR; Feeley BT; Ma CB; Zhang AL
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 May; 27(5):801-807. PubMed ID: 29548544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are short press-fit stems comparable to standard-length cemented stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Athwal GS; Teeter MG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):580-590. PubMed ID: 34968694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures.
Lo EY; Rizkalla J; Montemaggi P; Majekodunmi T; Krishnan SG
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1949-1956. PubMed ID: 33359397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cemented versus uncemented fixation of second-generation Trabecular Metal glenoid components: minimum 5-year outcomes.
Chen RE; Brown AM; Greenstein AS; Miller RJ; Mannava S; Voloshin I
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):e147-e156. PubMed ID: 32750528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using reverse shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical outcome and tuberosity healing?
Holschen M; Körting M; Khourdaji P; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2022 Dec; 142(12):3817-3826. PubMed ID: 34977963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Midterm results of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with a third-generation implant.
Levy JC; Berglund D; Vakharia R; Tahal DS; Mijc D; DeVito P; Motisi M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Apr; 28(4):698-705. PubMed ID: 30472054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiographic changes around humeral components in shoulder arthroplasty.
Raiss P; Edwards TB; Deutsch A; Shah A; Bruckner T; Loew M; Boileau P; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Apr; 96(7):e54. PubMed ID: 24695931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a patient-matched glenoid implant for severe glenoid bone deficiency.
Rangarajan R; Blout CK; Patel VV; Bastian SA; Lee BK; Itamura JM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S139-S148. PubMed ID: 32643608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a stem-free ellipsoid humeral implant in patients of all ages.
Goldberg SS; Baranek ES; Korbel KC; Blaine TA; Levine WN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Sep; 30(9):e572-e582. PubMed ID: 33486059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Humeral offset as a predictor of outcomes after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Carrazana-Suarez LF; Panico LC; Smolinski MP; Blake RJ; McCroskey MA; Sykes JB; Lin A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Jun; 31(6S):S158-S165. PubMed ID: 35378314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lee JH; Chun YM; Kim DS; Lee DH; Shin SJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2533-2542. PubMed ID: 33813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Humeral loosening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: an analysis of 2,342 cases.
Moen P; Patel JS; Simon P; Christmas KN; Haidamous G; Frankle MA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jun; 32(6S):S53-S59. PubMed ID: 36822498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uncemented versus cemented humeral stem fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
King JJ; Farmer KW; Struk AM; Wright TW
Int Orthop; 2015 Feb; 39(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 25412929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
