487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32772026)
1. An Abnormal Precone Endocervical Curettage Result Is an Independent Risk Factor for Positive Margins in Conization Specimens.
An J; Lei H; Xie X; Sun P
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(10):518-525. PubMed ID: 32772026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Clinical outcome and high risk factor for residual lesion analysis of HSIL half a year after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a clinical study of 1 502 cases].
Liu L; Chen LM; Tao X; Dai F; Guo LP; Zhang HW; Zhou XR; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):751-756. PubMed ID: 29179270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk Factors for Residual Disease in Hysterectomy Specimens After Conization in Post-Menopausal Patients with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3.
Sun X; Lei H; Xie X; Ruan G; An J; Sun P
Int J Gen Med; 2020; 13():1067-1074. PubMed ID: 33204141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of High-Grade Histopathology Diagnosed by Cervical Conization in Endocervical Curettage Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1: A Case-Control Study.
Cong Q; Xiao J; Tao X; Sui L
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2020 Jul; 24(3):247-251. PubMed ID: 32324695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy.
Moore BC; Higgins RV; Laurent SL; Marroum MC; Bellitt P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Aug; 173(2):361-6; discussion 366-8. PubMed ID: 7645609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Study on high risk factors associated with positive margin of cervix conization in patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].
Lu HX; Chen YX; Ni J; Wan XY; Lü WG; Xie X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 44(3):200-3. PubMed ID: 19570446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Residual lesions in uterine specimens after loop electrosurgical excision procedure in patients with CIN.
Jing L; Dan W; Zhunan L; Ying X; Yi C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Oct; 298(4):805-812. PubMed ID: 30167855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Necessity for subsequent surgery in women of child-bearing age with positive margins after conization.
Wang X; Xu J; Gao Y; Qu P
BMC Womens Health; 2021 May; 21(1):191. PubMed ID: 33962590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of endocervical curettage in detection and treatment of cervical canal lesions.
Lang L; Jia Y; Duan Z; Wu J; Luo M; Tian P
Histol Histopathol; 2022 Jan; 37(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 34755328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Post-conization endocervical curettage for estimating the risk of persistent or recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Meirovitz M; Eger G; Benharroch D; Dreiher J
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 121(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 23332656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG; Parva M; Holtz DO; Klemens JA; Dunton CJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2009 Jan; 13(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 19098600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors for residual disease after cervical conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 and positive surgical margins.
Ayhan A; Tuncer HA; Reyhan NH; Kuscu E; Dursun P
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jun; 201():1-6. PubMed ID: 27038228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The significance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies.
Felix JC; Muderspach LI; Duggan BD; Roman LD
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Dec; 84(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 7970484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What is the value of pre-surgical variables in addition to cone dimensions in predicting cone margin status?
Giannella L; Di Giuseppe J; Prandi S; Delli Carpini G; Tsiroglou D; Ciavattini A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():180-184. PubMed ID: 31812841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The pre- and postoperative value of endocervical curettage in the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer.
Fine BA; Feinstein GI; Sabella V
Gynecol Oncol; 1998 Oct; 71(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 9784317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Value of endocervical curettage in follow-up for patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia stage 2+ after loop electrosurgical excision.
Cao D; Shen K; Chen Y; Xu Y; Wu D
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):584-589. PubMed ID: 32586604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of training level on cervical cone size and resection margin status at conization: a retrospective study.
Montanari E; Grimm C; Schwameis R; Kuessel L; Polterauer S; Paternostro C; Husslein H
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jun; 297(6):1517-1523. PubMed ID: 29602979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The risk factors of residual lesions and recurrence of the high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) patients with positive-margin after conization.
Chen JY; Wang ZL; Wang ZY; Yang XS
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Oct; 97(41):e12792. PubMed ID: 30313104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Positive margin status in uterine cervix cone specimens is associated with persistent/recurrent high-grade dysplasia.
Shaco-Levy R; Eger G; Dreiher J; Benharroch D; Meirovitz M
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2014 Jan; 33(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 24300540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
